Reminder abolishes impairment of learning induced by paradoxical sleep retardation
Abstract
Rats were submitted to one daily trial in a relatively complex maze. When sleep was delayed (by the water tank technique) for 180 min after each trial, learning was impaired. A reminder treatment (90 sec exposure to contextual cues) immediately before each trial, counteracted the effects of sleep deprivation. The reminder did not in itself contain sufficient information to facilitate performance of non sleep delayed animals. These results suggest that a retrieval failure is involved in memory impairment caused by post-learning paradoxical sleep deprivation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deprivation of REM sleep appeared to primarily impair memory formation on complex tasks, like two-way shuttle box avoidance and complex mazes, which encompass a change in the animals regular repertoire.
“Deprivation of REM sleep (mostly without simultaneous sleep recording) appeared to primarily impair memory formation on complex tasks, like two-way shuttle box avoid-ance and complex mazes, which encompass a change in the animals regular repertoire (69, 100, 312, 516, 525, 539, 644, 710, 713, 714, 787, 900, 903-906, 992, 1021, 1072, 1111, 1113, 1238, 1352, 1353).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [516]
Cites
REM sleep facilitation of adaptive waking behavior: A review of the literature.
McGrath, M. J., & Cohen, D. B. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.24 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Lengthening of REM sleep duration consecutive to learning in the rat
Lucero, M. A. (1970) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(70)90299-4 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Leconte, P., Hennevin, E., & Bloch, V. (1973) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(73)90428-9 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationHennevin, E., Leconte, P., & Bloch, V. (1974) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(74)90210-8 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationChanges in paradoxical sleep accompanying instrumental learning in the cat
Lecas, J.-C. (1976) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(76)90066-5 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2012 · Cited by 2,783 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hars, B., & Hennevin, E.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Hars, Bernard
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 831-836
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994539541
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- sleep deprivation, REM sleep, learning disabilities, contextual cues, maze learning, rats
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cues, Learning, Male, Memory, Rats, Inbred Strains, Sleep Deprivation, Sleep, REM, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
