REM sleep modifications following a Morse code learning session in humans
Abstract
Various experimental data indicate that rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is involved in learning processes. In animals, any complex task in a learning environment leads to an increase of the consecutive total REM sleep time, especially just before learning completion. In humans, the oculomotor activity during REM sleep seems to constitute an interesting marker of learning performance. In this work, we focus on the qualitative analysis of REM sleep characteristics after a Morse code learning session. Eight male subjects were polygraphically recorded during three consecutive nights. A computer aided teaching session was performed just before bedrest onset of the experimental night. The learning performance (percentage of saving) was checked on awakening. The Morse code learning led to some modifications in REM sleep components, particularly increases of REM sleep time and number of REM episodes. We did not observe any significant modification in the total number of REMs in the experimental night. However, the correlative analysis between learning performance and sleep parameters indicates a superior r for the oculomotor activity than for the tonic components. This is consistent with the information processing hypothesis in which the temporal distribution of REMs reflects the subject's ability to increase the signal-noise ratio from environmental information intake.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More consistent evidence for an involvement of REM sleep was obtained for tasks with a strong procedural memory component, like learning a foreign language or Morse code.
“More consistent evidence for an involvement of REM sleep was obtained for tasks with a strong procedural memory component, like learning a foreign language or Morse code (e.g., Refs.488, 656, 657, 758, 1249).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [758]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- Mandai, O., Guerrien, A., Sockeel, P., Dujardin, K., & Leconte, P.
- Affiliations
- Université de Lille (FR)
- ORCID
- Dujardin, K.
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 639-642
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025536697
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- REM sleep, sleep and learning, oculomotor behavior, learning performance, signal-to-noise ratio, polygraph
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Arousal, Attention, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Memory, Problem Solving, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review