Cited by 63Eating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Cognitive restraint and sensitivity to cues for hunger and satiety

Ogden, Jane, Wardle, Jane·1990·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The present study provides experimental evidence for the effects of cognitive restraint on sensitivity to internal and external cues of hunger. The design involved four experimental conditions. In each condition the subjects were given either a high calorie or a low calorie early morning drink, and either correctly or incorrectly told its calorie content. The subjects, 10 restrained and 10 nonrestrained normal weight women, then rated their subjective hunger and satiety responses and had a test meal. All subjects reported lower sensations of hunger and higher sensations of fullness after the high calorie drink than the low calorie drink, indicating sensitivity to internal cues. However, the restrained eaters' ratings of hunger were also influenced by the believed content of the drink, indicating sensitivity to external cues. The implications of the results are analysed in terms of current theories of restrained eating and their relevance to further research into pathological eating regulation is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90112-h

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The OFC probably contributes to overeating irrespective of hunger signals.

    “The OFC plays a role in learning stimulus-reinforcement associations and conditioning (118,119), supports conditioned-cue-elicited feeding (120) and probably contributes to overeating irrespective of hunger signals (121).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [121]

  • Evidence indicates the OFC supports conditioned cue-elicited feeding and contributes to overeating irrespective of hunger signals.

    “There is evidence that the OFC also supports conditioned cue-elicited feeding (64) and that it contributes to overeating, irrespective of hunger signals (65).”

    From The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [65]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogden, J., & Wardle, J.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wardle, Jane
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-03
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
477-481
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967435682
Cited by
63
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
cognitive restraint, hunger cues, satiety cues, internal cues, external cues, dietary restraint, food intake regulation, subjective hunger, satiety, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Cognition, Cues, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Hunger, Inhibition, Psychological, Middle Aged, Satiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review