Cited by 205Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and CortisolRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Decreased hedonic responsiveness following chronic mild stress is not secondary to loss of body weight

Willner, Paul, Moreau, Jean-Luc, Kurre Nielsen, Christina, Papp, Mariusz, Sluzewska, Anna·1996·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Chronic exposure to mild unpredictable stress (CMS) has previously been found to decrease hedonic responsiveness, as measured by the consumption of palatable sweet solutions or sensitivity to brain stimulation reward. These effects are reversed by chronic treatment with antidepressant drugs, and the CMS procedure has been proposed as a relatively valid animal model of depression. It has recently been suggested that the behavioural effects of CMS may be secondary to loss of body weight. This article collates data from five laboratories using the CMS procedure. Data are presented from seven studies using five different rat strains, as well as CD1 mice. Three-week exposure to CMS significantly decreased sucrose consumption by Lister hooded, PVG hooded, Wistar, and Wistar WU rats, and by CD1 mice, and sensitivity to brain stimulation reward in Ibm:Ro Ro rats. Weight loss in different experiments varied between 0 and 10%. Hedonic sensitivity relative to body weight (e.g., mg sucrose/g body weight) decreased significantly in all experiments. Animals maintained on a restricted feeding regime lost weight but did not show decreases in sucrose intake. It is concluded that decreased hedonic sensitivity following chronic mild stress cannot be attributed to loss of body weight.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02256-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A common use of the sucrose preference test is to assess stress-induced anhedonia in animal models of depression, where reduced sucrose consumption is considered indicative of depressive-like behavior.

    “One of the most common uses of the sucrose preference test is to assess stress-induced anhedonia in animal models of depression, where reduced consumption of sucrose is considered indicative of depressive-like behavior (Willner et al., 1996).”

    From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Willner et al., 1996

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 205

Authors
Willner, P., Moreau, J.-L., Kurre Nielsen, C., Papp, M., & Sluzewska, A.
Affiliations
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • Maj Institute of Pharmacology (PL)
  • Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL)
Corresponding author
Willner, Paul
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-07
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
129-134
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049113427
Cited by
205
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
chronic mild stress, sucrose intake, weight loss, brain stimulation reward, animal models of depression, feed restriction, rat strains, ICR mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Arousal, Brain Mapping, Male, Motivation, Self Stimulation, Species Specificity, Stress, Psychological, Sucrose, Taste, Tegmentum Mesencephali, Weight Loss, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review