Decreased hedonic responsiveness following chronic mild stress is not secondary to loss of body weight
Abstract
Chronic exposure to mild unpredictable stress (CMS) has previously been found to decrease hedonic responsiveness, as measured by the consumption of palatable sweet solutions or sensitivity to brain stimulation reward. These effects are reversed by chronic treatment with antidepressant drugs, and the CMS procedure has been proposed as a relatively valid animal model of depression. It has recently been suggested that the behavioural effects of CMS may be secondary to loss of body weight. This article collates data from five laboratories using the CMS procedure. Data are presented from seven studies using five different rat strains, as well as CD1 mice. Three-week exposure to CMS significantly decreased sucrose consumption by Lister hooded, PVG hooded, Wistar, and Wistar WU rats, and by CD1 mice, and sensitivity to brain stimulation reward in Ibm:Ro Ro rats. Weight loss in different experiments varied between 0 and 10%. Hedonic sensitivity relative to body weight (e.g., mg sucrose/g body weight) decreased significantly in all experiments. Animals maintained on a restricted feeding regime lost weight but did not show decreases in sucrose intake. It is concluded that decreased hedonic sensitivity following chronic mild stress cannot be attributed to loss of body weight.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A common use of the sucrose preference test is to assess stress-induced anhedonia in animal models of depression, where reduced sucrose consumption is considered indicative of depressive-like behavior.
“One of the most common uses of the sucrose preference test is to assess stress-induced anhedonia in animal models of depression, where reduced consumption of sucrose is considered indicative of depressive-like behavior (Willner et al., 1996).”
From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Willner et al., 1996
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 205
- Authors
- Willner, P., Moreau, J.-L., Kurre Nielsen, C., Papp, M., & Sluzewska, A.
- Affiliations
- Swansea University (GB)
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
- Maj Institute of Pharmacology (PL)
- Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Willner, Paul
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-134
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049113427
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Keywords
- chronic mild stress, sucrose intake, weight loss, brain stimulation reward, animal models of depression, feed restriction, rat strains, ICR mice
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arousal, Brain Mapping, Male, Motivation, Self Stimulation, Species Specificity, Stress, Psychological, Sucrose, Taste, Tegmentum Mesencephali, Weight Loss, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review