Cited by 200Child Abuse and TraumaStress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The effects of early life stress on reward processing

Open access
Novick, Andrew M., Levandowski, Mateus L., Laumann, Laura E., Philip, Noah S., Price, Lawrence H., Tyrka, Audrey R.·2018·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Early life stress (ELS), in the form of childhood maltreatment, abuse, or neglect, increases the risk for psychiatric sequelae later in life. The neurobiology of response to early stress and of reward processing overlap substantially, leading to the prediction that reward processing may be a primary mediator of the effects of early life stress. We describe a growing body of literature investigating the effects of early life stressors on reward processing in animals and humans. Despite variation in the reviewed studies, an emerging pattern of results indicates that ELS results in deficits of ventral striatum-related functions of reward responsiveness and approach motivation, especially when the stressor is experienced in early in development. For stressors experienced later in the juvenile period and adolescence, the animal literature suggests an opposite effect, in which ELS results in increased hedonic drive. Future research in this area will help elucidate the transdiagnostic impact of early life stress, and therefore potentially identify and intervene with at-risk youth, prior to the emergence of clinical psychopathology.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review integrates animal and human evidence on how early life stress (ELS) shapes reward processing, arguing that effects depend on stressor type and developmental timing. It proposes that ELS-related reward alterations may serve as transdiagnostic risk markers and potential intervention targets.

Key findings

  • In animal models, maternal separation often reduced reward responsiveness and approach motivation, but sucrose preference findings were mixed: decreased preference appeared in 4 of 5 studies using male Sprague Dawley rats versus 1 of 6 studies using male Wistar rats. Post-weaning social isolation more consistently increased hedonic/approach-motivation measures while impairing cognitive flexibility and reward learning.
  • Human fMRI studies generally linked ELS to reduced basal ganglia/ventral striatal activation during reward anticipation and/or delivery, especially when adversity occurred earlier in life. Low maternal warmth was an exception, associated with increased medial prefrontal and striatal activation during reward anticipation.
  • Reduced striatal reward responses were often associated with depressive symptoms and sometimes mediated the relationship between ELS and depression; similar patterns were reported for alcohol dependence, while ADHD showed comparable ventral striatal activity without mediation.
  • Timing appeared important: earlier stressors such as maternal separation or early institutionalization more often reduced approach motivation and reward responsiveness, whereas later periadolescent stressors such as social isolation or low parental warmth could increase reward sensitivity.

Methods

  • Systematic PubMed review of human and animal studies published before December 9, 2017, using ELS-related terms combined with reward-related terms; animal searches used maternal separation, social isolation, or early life stress with reward, reinforcement, or sucrose preference terms.
  • Inclusion required ELS exposure and a behavioral measure of reward processing; human studies also required fMRI with a reward task. Studies of drug reward were excluded, and data were extracted by at least two authors.
  • The review synthesizes preclinical behavioral and neurobiological findings with human neuroimaging results, applying NIMH Research Domain Criteria Positive Valence Systems constructs where possible.

Limitations

  • Stated: the human literature is smaller than the animal literature; studies vary in ELS type and timing, age at testing, and methods. Animal maternal separation work is especially heterogeneous in separation procedures, control groups, statistical approaches, strain, sex, and unreported laboratory conditions. Animal models cannot fully capture human ELS, and human fMRI tasks often lack behavioral measures.
  • Stated: parsing specific reward subcomponents is limited by task precision, since many paradigms engage more than one process.
  • Evident: this is a narrative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis, so findings are not quantitatively pooled and publication bias is not assessed; proposed interventions targeting reward processing in ELS-exposed populations remain untested in the reviewed literature.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.02.002

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 182 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    Studies of maternal separation effects on liking or reward responsiveness differ notably in separation duration and frequency, temperature during separation, control group comparison, and sex of animals.

    “studies of the effect of maternal separation on liking/responsiveness to reward are notable for such methodological differences as duration and frequency of maternal separation, temperature during separation, control group comparison, and sex of the animals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    A difficulty in characterizing the maternal separation literature is the wide variety of separation methods, control groups, and statistical methods used.

    “One difficulty in characterizing the maternal separation literature is the wide variety of separation methods, control groups, and statistical methods that have been utilized (Lehmann and Feldon, 2000; Tractenberg et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lehmann and Feldon, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tractenberg et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning

    Most available data on early life stress and reward processing come from animals subjected to neonatal maternal separation or juvenile peer isolation.

    “While the majority of available data on ELS and reward processing is from animals subjected to either neonatal maternal separation or juvenile peer isolation, we also highlight results from other paradigms, such as social defeat stress, social instability, and chronic variable stress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Four of five studies using male Sprague Dawley rats found decreased sucrose preference after maternal separation.

    “Specifically, 4 out of the 5 studies using Sprague Dawley male rats demonstrated decreased sucrose preference following maternal separation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Evidence exists that maternal separation alters various types of reward learning.

    “In addition to changes to approach motivation and reward responsiveness, evidence exists for alterations of various types of reward learning as a result of maternal separation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 67
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Other factors such as sex of the animal or duration of separation did not account for variation in results.

    “Other factors, such as sex of animal or duration/length of separation, did not account for variation in results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In marmoset monkeys, daily isolation from parents during the first month of life left free consumption of a sweet solution unchanged at seven months but decreased effort expenditure on a progressive reinforcement schedule.

    “In one frequently cited study in marmoset monkeys, daily bouts of isolation from parents for the first month of life resulted in unchanged free consumption of a sweet solution at seven months, but decreased effort expenditure on a progressive reinforcement schedule (Pryce et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pryce et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Deficits in reversal learning have been reported with parental deprivation in monkeys and maternal separation in rats.

    “Deficits in the ability to alter behavior based on changing reward cues, known as reversal learning, have also been reported with parental deprivation in monkeys (Pryce et al., 2004) and maternal separation in rats (Matthews et al., 1996a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pryce et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Matthews et al., 1996a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Maternal separation was associated with decreased conditioned locomotor activity to food-related cues and decreased conditioned place preference to chocolate, indicating decreased reward valuation or incentive salience within approach motivation.

    “Maternal separation was also associated with decreased conditioned locomotor activity to food-related cues (Matthews et al., 1996b, 1996a) as well as decreased conditioned place preference to chocolate (Sasagawa et al., 2017) indicative of a decreased reward valuation/incentive salience function within the approach motivation construct.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Matthews et al., 1996b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Matthews et al., 1996a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sasagawa et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Maternal separation is associated with changes to the opioid system, but results conflict depending on methodology, showing both increases and decreases in endogenous peptide levels and ligand sensitivity.

    “Changes to the opioid system are also apparent with maternal separation, but conflicting results also exist based on specific methodology, demonstrating both increases and decreases in levels of endogenous peptides (Ploj et al., 2003; Vazquez et al., 2005) as well as sensitivity to ligands (Kalinichev et al., 2001; Vazquez et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ploj et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vazquez et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kalinichev et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Several studies found that maternal separation alone did not change sucrose preference, but a second stressor in adolescence or adulthood reduced sucrose preference.

    “Several studies found that while maternal separation by itself did not result in changes in sucrose preference, occurrence of a second stressor or challenge in adolescence or adulthood resulted in reduced sucrose preference (Hill et al., 2014; Klug and van den Buuse, 2012; Uchida et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hill et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Klug and van den Buuse, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Uchida et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive remediation, including working memory training and mindfulness, can enhance reward processing in non-clinical individuals with high trait social anhedonia and in prescription opioid abusers.

    “there are data showing that cognitive remediation, including working memory training and mindfulness, can enhance reward processing in non-clinical populations with high trait social anhedonia (Li et al., 2016) and in prescription opioid abusers (Garland, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Li et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Garland, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Data were extracted by at least two independent authors to ensure accuracy and limit bias.

    “Data were extracted by no fewer than two separate authors to ensure accuracy and limit bias (Tables 1, 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Deficits in reward processing occur in major depressive disorder, substance use disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and ADHD.

    “Deficits in reward processing are found in MDD (Admon and Pizzagalli, 2015), substance use disorders (Garfield et al., 2014; Tobler et al., 2016), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Kalebasi et al., 2015), schizophrenia (McCarthy et al., 2016), and ADHD (van Hulst et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Admon and Pizzagalli, 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Garfield et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tobler et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People with major depressive disorder show similar hedonic responses to sweet solutions as controls but are less willing to engage in tasks requiring higher effort.

    “individuals with MDD have similar hedonic responses to sweet solutions compared to controls (Berlin et al., 1998), but are less likely to engage in tasks requiring higher amounts of effort (Treadway et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Berlin et al., 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Treadway et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The particular psychopathological trajectory may depend on the type of early life stress, the developmental window when stress occurred, and genetic or epigenetic risk and protective factors.

    “The particular psychopathological trajectory might depend on the type of ELS (Carr et al., 2013) and the developmental window in which the stress was experienced (Andersen et al., 2008), as well as genetic and epigenetic risk and protective factors (Caspi et al., 2003; Palma-Gudiel and Fañanás, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Carr et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Andersen et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Caspi et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Early life stress has been associated with both increased and decreased HPA axis reactivity to stress, and both patterns have been linked to psychopathology.

    “Early life stress has been found to both exaggerate and attenuate the activity of the HPA axis in response to stress, both phenomena which have been linked to psychopathology (Carpenter et al., 2009; Heim C et al., 2000; Tyrka et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Carpenter et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Heim C et al., 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tyrka et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Receptors for CRF and glucocorticoids are distributed throughout the brain's reward circuitry, and their activation or blockade influences reward-related neurotransmission and behavior.

    “receptors for CRF and glucocorticoids are located throughout the reward circuitry of the brain, with their activation or blockade affecting reward-sensitive neurotransmission and behaviors (Bryce and Floresco, 2016; Craenenbroeck et al., 2005; Walsh et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bryce and Floresco, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Craenenbroeck et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Walsh et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because stress and reward neurobiology overlap, changes in stress neurobiology are likely to affect reward processing.

    “This overlap between stress neurobiology and reward neurobiology suggests that any change in stress neurobiology is likely to influence reward.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Animal models cannot fully replicate the complexity of human early life stress, and the relevance of their findings to human conditions is not always clear.

    “However, animal models cannot replicate the complexity of human ELS, and the significance of findings for human conditions is not always clear.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The precision of the paradigm limits how well the RDoC framework can parse reward processes, and several paradigms engage more than one process.

    “It should be noted that parsing of various reward processes using the RDoC framework is limited by the precision of the paradigm used, with several paradigms engaging more than one process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Alterations in reward processing predict later diagnoses of major depressive disorder, substance use disorder, and conduct disorder even in people who do not meet full diagnostic criteria.

    “Even in individuals who do not meet full diagnostic criteria, alterations in reward processing predict later diagnoses of MDD (Nelson et al., 2016), substance use disorder (Castellanos-Ryan et al., 2011; Garfield et al., 2014), and conduct disorder (Rubia et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Nelson et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Castellanos-Ryan et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rubia et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Variability and co-variation of early life stress factors pose a major challenge in human studies.

    “Variability and co-variation of these factors represent a major challenge in human studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Blocking dopamine receptors or depleting dopamine in the ventral striatum, specifically the nucleus accumbens, reduces the effort an animal will expend for reward but often leaves reward consumption and positive hedonic responses intact.

    “Antagonism of dopamine receptors or dopamine depletion in the ventral striatum (specifically the nucleus accumbens) reduce the amount of effort an animal will expend to obtain a reward, but often leave intact reward consumption and positive hedonic responses (e.g., affective facial expressions) (Berridge and Robinson, 1998; Salamone and Correa, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Berridge and Robinson, 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Salamone and Correa, 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Maternal separation interferes with the mother's postnatal regulatory influence on the animal's physiology and development and is considered by many to be an analog of human child neglect.

    “Maternal separation interferes with the postnatal regulatory influence that the mother has on the animal’s physiology and development, and is considered by many to be an analog of human child neglect (Carlyle et al., 2012; Pryce et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Carlyle et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pryce et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reward responsiveness also involves the nucleus accumbens, but opioids and endocannabinoids are the major neurochemical mediators of this component.

    “Responsiveness to reward also involves the nucleus accumbens (in addition to other regions, such as the ventral pallidum), but opioids and endocannabinoids are the major neurochemical mediators of reward responsiveness (Mahler et al., 2007; Peciña and Berridge, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mahler et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peciña and Berridge, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Dopamine in the nucleus accumbens appears necessary for approach motivation but less involved in hedonic experience or initial responsiveness to reward.

    “Thus, dopamine in the nucleus accumbens appears to be necessary for the approach motivation aspects of reward processing, but is less involved in the hedonic experience/initial responsiveness to reward.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Human brain development is protracted compared with other species, so despite having a more mature brain at birth than rats, humans remain vulnerable to insult.

    “development of the human brain is protracted compared to other species (Clancy et al., 2001; Miller et al, 2012; Semple et al., 2013), so despite having a more “mature” brain at birth compared to rats, vulnerability to insult remains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Clancy et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Miller et al, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Semple et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A common use of the sucrose preference test is to assess stress-induced anhedonia in animal models of depression, where reduced sucrose consumption is considered indicative of depressive-like behavior.

    “One of the most common uses of the sucrose preference test is to assess stress-induced anhedonia in animal models of depression, where reduced consumption of sucrose is considered indicative of depressive-like behavior (Willner et al., 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Willner et al., 1996 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The reward prediction error, in which changes in dopamine firing encode differences between expected and actual reward outcomes, enables dynamic learning from experience and updates in reward expectations.

    “The reward prediction error, in which changes in dopamine firing encode differences between an expected vs. actual reward outcome, allows for dynamic learning from experience and updates in reward expectations (Gradin et al., 2011; Schultz, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gradin et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schultz, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because most components of reward processing are subjective, their occurrence in animals can only be inferred from behavior.

    “Because most components of reward processing are ultimately subjective phenomena (motivation, hedonic experience), their occurrence in animals can only be inferred by the measurement of behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The most common animal manipulations used to model early life stress are maternal and peer separation.

    “the most common manipulations in animals to model ELS consist of maternal and peer separation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    In this reward circuit, information about reward cues, reward value, and required effort is processed and integrated to guide decision-making, motivation, action readiness, and pleasure.

    “It is in this circuit that information about reward cues, reward value, and required effort is processed, communicated, and then integrated to guide decision-making, facilitate motivation and readiness for action, and eventually result in the experience of pleasure (Rizvi et al., 2016) (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rizvi et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dopamine from the nucleus accumbens is important for rewarding cues to acquire incentive salience and elicit instrumental behavior.

    “dopamine from the nucleus accumbens is important for the ability of rewarding cues to gain incentive salience and elicit instrumental behavior (Peciña et al., 2003; Wyvell and Berridge, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Peciña et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wyvell and Berridge, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the prefrontal cortex, the orbital frontal cortex encodes and maintains reward value, while the anterior cingulate cortex monitors and determines the effort required to obtain rewards.

    “Within the PFC, the orbital frontal cortex encodes and maintains reward value, while the anterior cingulate cortex plays a role in monitoring and determining effort required to obtain rewards (for review see (Rushworth et al., 2011)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rushworth et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Reversal learning depends on an intact orbitofrontal cortex to inhibit the previously learned response.

    “Such reversal is known to depend on an intact orbitofrontal cortex to inhibit the prior learned response (Placek et al., 2013; Rolls, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Placek et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rolls, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Observation of orofacial movements is probably the only measure of liking independent of learning or motivational processes, but it is rarely studied.

    “Observation of orofacial movements is probably the only measure of liking independent of any learning or motivational process (Berridge and Robinson, 1998), but this is rarely studied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berridge and Robinson, 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Conditioned place preference can be conceptualized as probing reward valuation within approach motivation, though expectancy is also likely involved.

    “conditioned place preference can be conceptualized as probing the “reward valuation” subconstruct within approach motivation, but expectancy is arguably also involved, given the presence of Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior (Flagel et al., 2009; NIMH Research Domain Criteria).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Flagel et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites NIMH Research Domain Criteria

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Regions of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala are additional key brain areas in reward circuitry.

    “regions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and amygdala are additional key brain areas involved in reward circuitry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The amygdala encodes reward value and deviations between expected and actual outcomes through its projections to the prefrontal cortex.

    “Reward value and deviations of expected and actual outcomes are encoded via the amygdala through its projections to the PFC (Lichtenberg et al., 2017; Wassum and Izquierdo, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lichtenberg et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wassum and Izquierdo, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Multiple well-validated tests of reward behavior in animals allow some differentiation among reward components, but close scrutiny often shows that more than one component is involved.

    “While there are multiple well-validated tests of reward behavior in animals that allow some differentiation between various reward processing components, close scrutiny often reveals that more than one component is likely involved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Dopamine signaling to the basal ganglia, including the nucleus accumbens, contributes to the reward prediction error.

    “Dopamine signaling to the basal ganglia, including the nucleus accumbens, also plays a role in what is known as the reward prediction error, a subconstruct of approach motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gradin et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schultz, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Stressors earlier in life may be more likely to affect subcortical reward functions such as approach motivation and reward responsiveness, whereas stressors later in adolescence may more likely affect learning, valuation, and effort prediction.

    “Thus, stressors occurring earlier in life might be more likely to affect subcortical reward functions (approach motivation and reward responsiveness), with those later in adolescence more likely affecting learning, valuation, and effort prediction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Normative development of reward-related brain regions involves structural and functional changes from childhood to adulthood, with prefrontal cortex maturation typically delayed relative to subcortical regions.

    “Normative development of the brain regions involved in reward processing demonstrates structural and functional changes from childhood to adulthood, with maturation of PFC regions typically delayed compared to that of subcortical regions (Galvan et al., 2006; Mills et al., 2014; Somerville et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Galvan et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mills et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Somerville et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Conditioned place preference is thought to measure incentive motivation to seek out cues previously associated with reward.

    “The conditioned place preference task is thought to measure incentive motivation to seek out cues previously associated with reward (Bardo and Bevins, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bardo and Bevins, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Post-weaning social isolation during the juvenile and adolescent period produces sensory processing deficits and increases in fear and anxiety-like behavior.

    “While pre-weaning maternal separation is often conceptualized as early life neglect and results in a depressive-like phenotype (Pryce et al., 2005), post-weaning social isolation during the juvenile and adolescent period produces sensory processing deficits and increases in fear and anxiety-like behavior (Fone and Porkess, 2008; Lukkes et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fone and Porkess, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lukkes et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pre-weaning maternal separation is often conceptualized as early life neglect and produces a depressive-like phenotype.

    “While pre-weaning maternal separation is often conceptualized as early life neglect and results in a depressive-like phenotype (Pryce et al., 2005), post-weaning social isolation during the juvenile and adolescent period produces sensory processing deficits and increases in fear and anxiety-like behavior (Fone and Porkess, 2008; Lukkes et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pryce et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The neonatal rat depends on the dam for protection from predators, nutrition, thermoregulation, and waste elimination.

    “The neonatal rat relies upon the dam for protection from predators, nutrition, thermoregulation, and proper elimination of waste (Hofer, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hofer, 1996 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These findings support a two-hit model in which early life stress confers vulnerability to psychiatric symptoms, but symptom onset occurs only after a subsequent stressor.

    “These studies support a “two hit” model in which ELS, such as maternal separation, confers vulnerability to symptoms of psychiatric illness, but with symptom onset only occurring after exposure to a subsequent stressor (Bayer et al., 1999; Maynard et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bayer et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Maynard et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This link is an important concept in addiction and is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between early life stress and increased risk of substance use disorders.

    “This is an important concept in the field of addiction (Burke and Miczek, 2014b; George et al., 2012; Sinha, 2008), that is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between ELS and increased risk of substance use disorders (Andersen and Teicher, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Burke and Miczek, 2014b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites George et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sinha, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Other studies show enhanced mesolimbic dopamine function, with increased nucleus accumbens dopamine release in response to stress or amphetamine and increased locomotion in response to cocaine.

    “other studies demonstrate enhanced mesolimbic dopamine function, as evidenced by increased nucleus accumbens dopamine release in response to stress (Brake et al., 2004) or amphetamine (Hall et al., 1999), as well as increased locomotion in response to cocaine (Brake et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brake et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hall et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These changes suggest that high maternal care enhances HPA axis regulation, allowing greater control of the endocrine stress cascade and better regulation of emotional behavior.

    “These changes suggest that high levels of maternal care enhance HPA axis regulation and allow more control of the endocrine stress cascade and better regulation of emotional behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Matthews and colleagues found decreased sensitivity to amphetamine's enhancing effects and increased sensitivity to D2 antagonists' blunting effects on approach motivation behaviors after maternal separation.

    “Matthews and colleagues have demonstrated decreased sensitivity to the enhancing effects of amphetamine and increased sensitivity to the blunting effects of D2 antagonists on behaviors related to approach motivation (Matthews et al., 1996bMatthews and Robbins, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Matthews et al., 1996b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Matthews and Robbins, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Reduced conditioning to predictive appetitive cues may reflect decreased motivation but may also indicate impairments in associative learning.

    “reduced conditioning to predictive appetitive cues, while possibly reflecting decreased motivation, might also indicate impairments in associative learning (Matthews et al., 1996a, 1996b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Matthews et al., 1996a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Matthews et al., 1996b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Maternal separation results in a greater peak and longer duration of glucocorticoid release after stress, decreased glucocorticoid receptor expression, increased CRF expression, and reduced benzodiazepine receptor binding.

    “maternal separation results in a greater peak and duration of glucocorticoid release in response to stress, decreased GR expression, increased CRF expression, and reduced benzodiazepine receptor binding (Sánchez et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sánchez et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Because maternal separation deprives rat pups of maternal care, it would be expected to produce changes opposite to those seen with high maternal care, and this appears to be the case.

    “Given that maternal separation deprives rat pups from opportunities for maternal care, this paradigm would be expected to result in changes opposite to that seen in rats exposed to high levels of maternal care, and this does appear to be the case (Ladd et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ladd et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pups raised by dams with high maternal care show increased hippocampal synaptogenesis, increased glucocorticoid receptor mRNA, decreased hypothalamic CRF mRNA, and increased benzodiazepine receptor binding in emotion-regulating brain regions.

    “Pups raised by dams who exhibit high levels of maternal care demonstrate increases in hippocampal synaptogenesis (Liu et al., 2000), increased glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mRNA, decreased hypothalamic CRF mRNA (Liu et al., 1997), and increased benzodiazepine receptor binding in brain regions regulating emotion (Caldji et al., 2000b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Liu et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Liu et al., 1997 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Caldji et al., 2000b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Differences in the timing and duration of separation may explain divergent findings on sucrose preference.

    “One explanation for these divergent findings might be the existence of differences in the timing and duration of separation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites McCool and Chappell, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Panksepp, 1981 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Post-weaning social isolation leads to deficits in reversal learning and attentional set shifting.

    “This paradigm also results in deficits in reversal learning (Amitai et al., 2014; Li et al., 2007), as well as in learning new strategies based on a previously unrelated cue (attentional set shifting) (Schrijver and Würbel, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Amitai et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Li et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schrijver and Würbel, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    By depriving animals of play experiences that normally guide cortical development, post-weaning social isolation is conceptualized as a rodent model of adolescent adversity with long-lasting effects on neurobiology and behavior.

    “By depriving animals of the play experiences that normally guide cortical development, post-weaning social isolation is conceptualized as a rodent model of adolescent adversity with long-lasting effects on neurobiology and behavior (Fone and Porkess, 2008; Lukkes et al., 2009; Robbins, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fone and Porkess, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lukkes et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Robbins, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most studies report lower striatal activation in motivation and reward tasks, but not when the stressor is parental warmth variation.

    “While most studies demonstrate decreased activation of the striatal regions in tasks engaging motivational and reward responsiveness processes, this was not the case when the specific stressor investigated was variations in parental warmth.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Even though socially isolated rats show greater approach motivation, they obtain less reward on low-effort tasks because of perseveration.

    “For example, despite enhanced approach motivation compared to socially housed controls, when a reward task requires fewer lever presses, socially isolated rats end up receiving less reward due to perseveration (Morgan and Einon, 1975).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morgan and Einon, 1975

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    One study found lower ventral striatum and putamen activity during anticipation but higher activity during delivery, and only for positive verbal feedback rather than money.

    “However, in one study, while activation in the ventral striatum and putamen was decreased during anticipation, activity was increased during the delivery phase, but only for positive verbal feedback as opposed to monetary reward (Boecker et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boecker et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social isolation generally increases sucrose preference in rodents, though some studies report discrepant results.

    “In tasks measuring liking, social isolation generally results in increased sucrose preference (Brenes and Fornaguera, 2008, 2009; Colonnello et al., 2011; Hall et al., 1998a; Van den Berg et al., 2000), although there are some discrepant reports (McCool and Chappell, 2009; Pisu et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brenes and Fornaguera, 2008, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Colonnello et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hall et al., 1998a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Findings on positive emotional stimuli diverge: institutionalized children show lower ventral striatal response to positive faces, whereas abused adolescents show greater reactivity to positive social cues.

    “While institutionally reared children had decreased ventral striatal response to positive emotional faces (Goff et al., 2013), adolescents with a history of physical and sexual abuse demonstrated increased reactivity to positively valenced social stimuli (Dennison et al., 2016), suggesting a potential difference in the effects of neglect vs abuse.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goff et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dennison et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These tasks each include an anticipation phase and a delivery phase; brain activity during these phases is used to infer motivation and reward responsiveness, respectively.

    “Both tasks have two phases, an anticipation phase, in which the subject is given information about the potential for reward, and a delivery phase, in which the reward is received. By measuring brain activity during the anticipation and delivery phases, a motivational component and a reward responsiveness component can be inferred, respectively (Knutson et al., 2000; Lutz and Widmer, 2014; Wang et”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Knutson et al., 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lutz and Widmer, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Human fMRI and animal studies differ notably: animal work relies almost entirely on behavior, whereas human studies report behavior far less often.

    “A major difference between the human fMRI studies and the animal studies is that while the animal studies rely almost solely on behavioral measures to infer reward processes, behavioral measures (reaction times, performance) are reported much less frequently in the human literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Together, these studies suggest that low maternal warmth can heighten brain sensitivity to reward anticipation, with effects varying by sex and by the timing of stress and testing.

    “These two studies suggest that, depending on gender and developmental timing of stressor and testing, low maternal warmth may increase the brain’s sensitivity to anticipation of reward.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adolescent female rats given variable stressors later consume less sucrose, whereas males do not.

    “there is some indication that female rats exposed to variable stressors in adolescence (restraint, social defeat) demonstrate subsequent deficits in sucrose consumption (Bourke and Neigh, 2011; Pohl et al., 2007) while male animals do not (Bourke and Neigh, 2011; Novick et al., 2013; Pohl et al., 2007; Toth et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bourke and Neigh, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pohl et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Novick et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social isolation increases indices of approach motivation, including enhanced responding for increasing sucrose concentrations and greater conditioned responses to sucrose-related stimuli.

    “Increased indices of approach motivation are also found following social isolation, with evidence of enhanced responding for increasing concentrations of sucrose (Cuenya et al., 2015; Hall et al., 1997), as well as greater conditioned responses to sucrose-related stimuli (Jones et al., 1990).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cuenya et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hall et al., 1997 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jones et al., 1990 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social isolation after weaning increases HPA axis sensitivity, particularly in males, and leads to an anxiety-like profile.

    “As with maternal separation, post-weaning social isolation results in enhanced sensitivity of the HPA axis, especially in male rats (Holson et al., 1991; Viveros et al., 1988; Weiss et al., 2004), as well as an overall anxiogenic phenotype.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Holson et al., 1991 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Viveros et al., 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Weiss et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    That link was significant for stress in early childhood (kindergarten to grade 3) but not for later stress.

    “This relationship was significant when the stress was experienced earlier in life (kindergarten through grade 3) but not later (Hanson et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hanson et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adolescent girls with low early-adolescent maternal warmth show a similar increase in striatal activation during reward anticipation, and that increase is linked to more depressive symptoms.

    “A similar association was found for adolescent females with low maternal warmth in early adolescence, although increased activity was associated with increased depressive symptoms (Casement et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Casement et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    On a probabilistic reward task, reduced reinforcement learning appears in women with childhood sexual abuse and MDD, physically abused adolescents, and young adults with many early-life adversities.

    “For example, women with a history of both childhood sexual abuse and MDD (Pechtel and Pizzagalli, 2013), adolescents exposed to physical abuse (Hanson et al., 2017), and young adults who had high levels of various adversities in early life (Birn et al., 2017) demonstrate decreased reinforcement learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pechtel and Pizzagalli, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hanson et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Birn et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reward-processing changes did not mediate the ELS-ADHD association, although similar ventral striatal activity patterns appeared.

    “While changes to reward processing did not mediate the association between ELS and ADHD, similar patterns of ventral striatal activity were found (Boecker et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boecker et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    ELS probably changes fundamental affect and cognition, increasing vulnerability to psychopathology.

    “As posited in the introduction, ELS likely alters core aspects of affect and cognition that in turns makes individuals susceptible to psychopathology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Two studies reported longer reaction times on the monetary incentive delay task in people with prior ELS, while children with reactive attachment disorder had shorter reaction times on a gambling task; other studies either did not assess behavior or found no differences.

    “Dillon et al. (2009) and Boeker et al. (2014) found increased reaction times in individuals with prior ELS in the monetary incentive delay task, while decreased reaction times were noted in children with reactive attachment disorder in a gambling task (Takiguchi et al., 2015), although the remainder of studies either did not measure behavior (Casement et al., 2015, 2014; Goff et al., 2013; Hanson”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dillon et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Boecker et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Takiguchi et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Lower striatal responsiveness in humans is associated with anhedonia and depression, yet research on its behavioral consequences is scarce.

    “While it does appear that decreased striatal responsiveness in humans is linked to anhedonia and depressive symptoms, studies measuring how this impacts actual behavior are lacking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    No interventions yet target subclinical anhedonia or reinforcement-learning deficits in at-risk groups, but evidence suggests they could work.

    “To our knowledge, interventions meant to target subclinical anhedonia or impairments in reinforcement learning in at risk populations have yet to be tested, however there is evidence for potential efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mori et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Garland, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Acheson et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many human studies link lower basal ganglia activation during reward anticipation or receipt to depressive symptoms, and this activation often mediates the ELS-depression relationship.

    “in many of the human studies reviewed, decreased activation in regions of the basal ganglia to the anticipation or receipt of reward was not only associated with depressive symptoms (Dillon et al., 2009; Goff et al., 2013), but often found to mediate the relationship between ELS and depression (Corral-Frías et al., 2015; Hanson et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dillon et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Goff et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Corral-Frías et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The monetary incentive delay and reward guessing tasks suit imaging well but are poorer at detecting behavioral differences in reward processing.

    “The monetary incentive delay task and the reward guessing task, while well adapted for use with imaging, are less suited to capturing differences in reward behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Several fMRI studies using the monetary incentive delay task find ventral striatal activation changes without reaction-time changes, which suggests reaction time may be an insensitive reward-processing marker.

    “It should be noted that in various studies utilizing fMRI and the monetary incentive delay task, changes in ventral striatal activation are often found in the absence of changes in reaction time (Jansma et al., 2013; Saji et al., 2013; Smoski et al., 2011), suggesting that reaction time may lack sensitivity as a marker for reward processing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jansma et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Saji et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Smoski et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    After behavioral activation therapy, people show greater ventromedial PFC activation while anticipating loss on a monetary incentive delay task, which is thought to support continued rewarding activity despite negative mood.

    “When individuals who have completed behavioral activation therapy are challenged with a monetary incentive delay task, they demonstrate increased activation of the ventromedial PFC during anticipation of a loss, which is interpreted as allowing for ongoing engagement in rewarding activity despite negative emotions (Mori et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mori et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Taken together, the small human literature indicates that ELS relates to lower neural reward responsiveness on both motivation and reward responsiveness measures, except in studies of low maternal warmth.

    “Overall, a limited literature in humans does suggest that ELS is associated with decreased neural responsiveness to reward on both measures of approach motivation and reward responsiveness, although studies evaluating decreased maternal warmth appear to be an exception.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
79 of 79
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Animal models of early life stress (maternal separation, post-weaning social isolation) are valid analogues for human early life stress (e.g., institutionalization, maltreatment) in reward processing research.

    “Interestingly, this is similar to the developmental pattern that is seen in the animal literature, with maternal separation more likely to result in deficits in approach motivation and responsiveness to reward compared to post-weaning social isolation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The developmental timing of stressors in animal models corresponds to human developmental periods (e.g., maternal separation to early childhood, social isolation to periadolescence).

    “Despite limitations in the available human and animal literature, decreased indices of approach motivation and responsiveness to reward appear to be more common when the stressor is experienced earlier in life (i.e., maternal separation in animals, or early institutionalization in humans).”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complete social isolation in adolescent rodents evokes widespread structural and functional brain changes, most prominently in dopamine and serotonin systems and cortical/striatal targets.

    “Complete social isolation in adolescent rodents evokes widespread structural and functional changes in the brain, most prominently in neuromodulatory dopamine and serotonin systems and particularly within cortical and striatal targets.33, 36, 37”

    From The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

    Section 4.2.2 describes post-weaning isolation in juvenile and adolescent rodents as having long-lasting neurobiological effects. Section 4.2.2.1 reports altered dopamine function in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex, supporting the functional and cortical/striatal parts of the claim. The passages do not establish structural brain changes or effects on serotonin systems, and they do not support calling those effects the most prominent. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Complete social deprivation during rodent adolescence affects brain development, mainly motivation and reward processes.

    “Thus, complete social deprivation during rodent adolescence affects brain development, mainly affecting motivation and reward processes.33, 36”

    From The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

    Section 4.2.2 (page not supplied) describes post-weaning social isolation during the juvenile and adolescent period as affecting cortical development, neurobiology, reward learning, and approach motivation. It also reports sensory-processing deficits and increased fear and anxiety-like behavior, so the claim that its effects are mainly on motivation and reward is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies depriving rodents of peer contact during peak social play periods (postnatal days 21-43, roughly early to mid adolescence in humans) show increased anxiety-like and depression-like behaviours, reward seeking, impaired reward learning, and impaired habituation to novel stimuli.

    “In most of these studies, animals were isolated from peers from around postnatal days 21 to 43, corresponding roughly to early adolescence (aged 10–13 years) and mid adolescence (aged 14–16 years) in humans.34 Such studies show similar effects to those investigating isolation throughout the whole adolescent period, including increased anxiety-like behaviours, depression-like behaviours, and reward”

    From The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These brain effects are specific to isolation during rodent adolescence and do not occur to a similar extent when isolation occurs before or after adolescence.

    “Importantly, these effects are specific to isolation during rodent adolescence and do not occur to a similar extent when isolation occurs before or after adolescence.33, 36”

    From The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

    Section 4.2.2 describes lasting neurobiological effects of post-weaning isolation during the juvenile and adolescent period, and its neurobiology subsection reports changes in reward circuitry. The paper does not establish that those brain effects are specific to adolescent isolation or compare their extent with isolation before or after adolescence. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most consistent findings report increased dopamine release in reward regions such as nucleus accumbens and decreased dopamine activity in prefrontal cortex following adolescent isolation.

    “More specifically, although some divergent effects have been observed, the most consistent findings report that dopamine release in reward regions such as the nucleus accumbens increases following adolescent isolation, but dopamine activity in the prefrontal cortex decreases.33, 36, 37”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Harlow citation year differs from the reference list

    Minor

    The text cites Harlow's study as published in 1958, but the matching Harlow entry in the reference list is dated 1959.

1 of 1

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 203 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Andersen, 2008, Desperately driven and no brakes: developmental stress exposure and subsequent risk for substance abuse, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Novick, A. M., Levandowski, M. L., Laumann, L. E., Philip, N. S., Price, L. H., & Tyrka, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Butler Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Novick, Andrew M.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
101
Pages
80-103
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791377417
Cited by
192
References
203
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R25 MH090947, R01HD086487, R01 MH101107)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2 CX000724)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
early life stress, reward processing, child abuse, childhood abuse, child neglect, ventral striatum, approach motivation, transdiagnostic mechanisms, at-risk youth, psychiatric risk
MeSH terms
Adverse Childhood Experiences, Animals, Child, Humans, Reward, Stress, Psychological, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review