The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Interpretation of Fossil Pollen Spectra: Dissimilarity Coefficients and the Method of Modern Analogs
Abstract
Dissimilarity coefficients measure the difference between multivariate samples and provide a quantitative aid to the identification of modern analogs for fossil pollen samples. How eight coefficients responded to differences among modern pollen samples from eastern North America was tested. These coefficients represent three different classes: (1) unweighted coefficients that are most strongly influenced by large-valued pollen types, (2) equal-weight coefficients that weight all pollen types equally but can be too sensitive to variations among rare types, and (3) signal-to-noise coefficients that are intermediate in their weighting of pollen types. The studies with modern pollen allowed definition of critical values for each coefficient, which, when not exceeded, indicate that two pollen samples originate from the same vegetation region. Dissimilarity coefficients were used to compare modern and fossil pollen samples, and modern samples so similar to fossil samples were found that most of three late Quaternary pollen diagrams could be “reconstructed” by substituting modern samples for fossil samples. When the coefficients indicated that the fossil spectra had no modern analogs, then the reconstructed diagrams did not match all aspects of the originals. No modern analogs existed for samples from before 9300 yr B.P. at Kirchner Marsh, Minnesota, and from before 11,000 yr B.P. at Wintergreen Lake, Michigan, but modern analogs existed for almost all Holocene samples from these two sites and Brandreth Bog, New York.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vegetation and environment in Eastern North America during the Last Glacial Maximum
Jackson, S. T., Webb, R. S., Anderson, K. H., Overpeck, J. T., Webb III, T., Williams, J. W., & Hansen, B. C. S. (2000) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0277-3791(99)00093-1 · Cited by 335
Self-citationStevenson, A. C., & Harrison, R. J. (1992) · Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society · doi:10.1017/s0079497x00004175 · Cited by 88
Newby, P. E., Killoran, P., Waldorf, M. R., Shuman, B. N., Webb, R. S., & Webb, T. (2000) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1006/qres.1999.2120 · Cited by 75
Self-citationSHANE, L. C. K. (1987) · Boreas · doi:10.1111/j.1502-3885.1987.tb00750.x · Cited by 75
Phytolith Evidence for Early Maize (Zea Mays) in the Northern Finger Lakes Region of New York
Hart, J. P., Thompson, R. G., & Brumbach, H. J. (2003) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/3557065 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Overpeck, J. T., Webb, T., & Prentice, I. C.
- Venue
- Quaternary Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-108
- ISSN
- 0033-5894 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-0287
- OpenAlex
- W2003501861
- Cited by
- 1,153
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Interpretation of Fossil Pollen Spectra: Dissimilarity Coefficients and the Method of Modern Analogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0033-5894(85)90074-2
- The paper
- Overpeck, J. T., Webb, T., & Prentice, I. C. (1985). Quantitative Interpretation of Fossil Pollen Spectra: Dissimilarity Coefficients and the Method of Modern Analogs. Quaternary Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(85)90074-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.