CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistorySoil and Environmental Studies

Phytolith Evidence for Early Maize (Zea Mays) in the Northern Finger Lakes Region of New York

Hart, John P., Thompson, Robert G., Brumbach, Hetty Jo·2003·American Antiquity
DOI 10.2307/3557065
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The timing of crop introductions, particularly of maize (Zea mays), has been of long-standing interest to archaeologists working in various regions of eastern North America. The earliest confirmed macrobotanical evidence for maize in New York is A.D. 1000. We report on the results of accelerator mass spectrometer (AMS) dating, phytolith analysis, and stable carbon isotope analysis of carbonized cooking residues adhering to the interior surface of pottery sherds from three sites in the northern Finger Lakes region of New York. Maize, squash (Cucurbita sp.), wild rice (Zizania aquatica), and sedge (Cyperus sp.) were identified in phytolith assemblages dating to as early as the first half of the calibrated seventh century A.D. The results demonstrate that low δ13C values on cooking residues cannot be used to preclude the possibility that maize was cooked in vessels. Two of the maize-bean-squash crop triad were present in New York at least 350 years earlier than previously documented, and the Northern Flint Corn Complex was present in New York by at least the first half of the seventh century A.D. This research highlights the potential of cooking residues to provide new insights on prehistoric plant-based subsistence.///El fechamiento de la introducción de productos agrícolas, especialmente el maíz (Zea mays), ha sido de interés por mucho tiempo para los arqueólogos que realizan investigaciones en varias regiones del este de América del Norte. La evidencia macrobotánica más antigua de maíz en Nueva York data de 1000 d.C.. En este estudio se presentan los resultados del fechamiento por EMA, de análisis de fitolitos y de isótopos estables de carbono realizados en residuos de alimentos carbonizados adheridos en la superficie interna de tiestos de tres sitios en el norte de la region de los Finger Lakes, Nueva York. De los conjuntos de fitolitios se han identificado maíz, calabaza (Cucurbita sp.), arroz silvestre (Zizania aquatica) y juncos (Cyperus sp.), con fechas calibradas correspondientes a la primera mitad de siglo VII d.C. Los resultados demuestran que los valores bajo de 13C en los residuos de alimentos no pueden ser usados para excluir la posibilidad de que el maíz se cocinaba en vasijas. Del trío maíz-frijol-calabaza, dos de los componentes estaban presentes en Nueva York por lo menos 350 ańos antes de lo que se había reportado previamente, mientras que el complejo de Maíz Northern Flint se identifica en Nueva York por lo menos para la primera mitad del siglo VII d.C. En esta investigación resalta el potencial que tienen los residuos de alimentos para aportar nuevas perspectivas acerca de la subsistencia basada en plantas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3557065

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Wagner, 1987, Uses of Plants by Fort Ancient Indians.
  2. Funk, 1993, Archaeological Investigations in the Upper Susquehanna Valley, New York State.
  3. Asch Sidell, 2002, Paleoethnobotanical Indicators of Subsistence and Settlement Change in the Northeast, Northeast Subsistence- Settlement Change: A.D. 700-1300,, 241
  4. Thompson, 1995, Brainerd Ware Pottery Function Explored Through Opal Phytolith Analysis of Food Residues, Journal of Ethnobiology, 15, 305
  5. Stoltman, 1983, The Evolution of Human Ecosystems in the Eastern Woodlands, Late Quaternary Environments of the United States, Volume 2, The Holocene,, 252
  6. 10.2307/2444278 · DOI
  7. Crawford, 2003, Paleoethnobotany in the Northeast, People and Plants in Ancient Eastern North America,, 172
  8. Ritchie, 1944, The Pre-Iroquoian Occupations of New York State.
  9. Hart, 2002, Maize and Villages: A Summary and Critical Assessment of Current Northeast Early Late Prehistoric Evidence, Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700-1300,, 345
  10. Knapp, 2002, Pits, Plants, and Place: Recognizing Late Prehistoric Subsistence and Settlement Diversity in the Upper Susquehanna Drainage, Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700-1300,, 167
  11. Thompson, 1994, The Identification of Phytoliths in Food Residues on Utilized Ceramics, Journal of Electron Microscopy Techniques, 7, 146
  12. Ritchie, 1973, The Kipp Island Site (Aub. 12-1, 13-1), Aboriginal Settlement Patterns in the Northeast,, 154
  13. Thompson, 1987, The Identification of Maize in Food Residues on Utilized Ceramics at the Shea Site (32CS101), Phytolitharian Newsletter, 8, 7
  14. Ferris, 1999, Telling Tales: Interpretive Trends in Southern Ontario Late Woodland Archaeology, Ontario Archaeology, 68, 1
  15. 1993-2001, NYAC Abstracts
  16. Shay, 1980, Food Plants in Manitoba, Directions in Manitoba Prehistory, Papers in Honor of Chris Vickers,, 233
  17. King, 1992, Floral Remains, The Prehistory of the Catawissa Bridge Replacement Site (36C09), Columbia County, Pennsylvania,
  18. Mulholland, 1993, A Test of Phytolith Analysis at Big Hidatsa, North Dakota, Current Research in Phytolith Analysis: Applications in Archaeology and Paleoecology,, 131
  19. Thompson, 2000, Phytolith Analysis of Food Residues from Yutopian, Argentina, Report prepared for Dr. Joan Gero. On file with Joan Gero
  20. Kuhn, 2001, The New York State Historic Preservation Office Archaeological Program, 1990 to 2000: A Ten-Year Retrospective, The Bulletin of the New York State Archaeological Association, 117, 25
  21. Hart, 1999a, Dating Roundtop's Domesticates: Implications for Northeastern Late Prehistory, Current Northeast Paleoethnobotany,, 47
  22. Hatch James, 1980, The Fisher Farm Site: A Late Woodland Hamlet in Context.
  23. Pearsall, 1993, The Nature and Status of Phytolith Analysis, Current Research in Phytolith Analysis: Applications in Archaeology and Paleoecology,, 9
  24. Little, 1999, Maize Age and Isotope Values at the Goldkrest Site, Current Northeast Paleoethnobotany,, 81
  25. Ritchie, 1969, The Archaeology of New York State
  26. Mitchell, 2003, A Compendium of New York Plants, Their Habitats and Distributions and Uses.
  27. Bender, 2002a, New Dates for Owasco Pots, Northeast Subsistence- Settlement Change: A.D. 700-1300,, 153
  28. Hart, 2000a, New Dates on Classic New York State Sites: Just How Old Are Those Longhouses?, Northeast Anthropology, 60, 1
  29. Thompson, 1993, Opal Phytolith Analysis Residues from the Mantaro Valley, Peru, Paper presented at the Northeast Andeanist Conference
  30. Hart, 1996, Prehistoric Agricultural Systems in the West Branch of the Susquehanna River Basin, A.D. 800 to A.D. 1350, Northeast Anthropology, 52, 1
  31. Yarnell, 1993, The Importance of Native Crops during the Late Archaic and Woodland Periods, Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands,, 13
  32. Gates St-Pierre, 2001, Two Sites, But Two Phases? Revisiting Kipp Island and Hunter's Home, Northeast Anthropology, 62, 31
  33. Galinat, 1967, Plant Habit and the Adaptation of Corn.
  34. Asch Sidell, 2000, Westheimer and Parslow Field Sites Tabular Summary.
  35. Cassedy, 1999, New Data on the Chronology of Maize Horticulture in Eastern New York and Southern New England, Current Northeast Paleoethnobotany,, 85
  36. Bender, 2002b, The Point Peninsula to Owasco Transition in Central New York, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology
  37. Egan, 2001, Archaeobotanical Analysis, Stage III Archaeological Investigations at Zinselmeier No. 1 Site (ANR-222; A069-15-0026) Ontario County, New York,, 7-1

Cited by

Still being checked.

Related

Authors
Hart, J. P., Thompson, R. G., & Brumbach, H. J.
Affiliations
  • New York State Museum (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Venue
American Antiquity
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2003-10
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
619-640
ISSN
  • 0002-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-5064
DOI
10.2307/3557065
OpenAlex
W2314754229
Cited by
73
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 4860 d)
Locations
American Antiquity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
maize, crop introduction, phytoliths, cooking residues, pottery sherds, carbonized residue, stable carbon isotopes, squash, wild rice, Cyperaceae, prehistoric subsistence, eastern North America, Finger Lakes region, New York

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review