Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial Patterns of Atmospheric Pollen Transport in a Montane Region,

Solomon, Allen M., Silkworth, Alison B.·1986·Quaternary Research
DOI 10.1016/0033-5894(86)90053-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Annual pollen deposition (pollen cm−2 yr−1) was sampled for 6 yr in the southern Sierra Nevada, the Owens Valley, and the Inyo Mountains of central California. Spatial pollen distributions were examined for anemophilous plants which are limited to growth sites (1) at high elevations on one or both mountain ranges, (2) on lower mountain slopes, and (3) on the Owens Valley floor, Pollen deposition values for high- and low-elevation plants changed by a factor of 5 to 10 between adjacent sample sites which straddle boundaries of the plant communities in which the source plants grow. Pollen deposition values were high and variable within communities in which the species grew. Pollen deposition beyond source populations was low and uniform despite great differences in distance of sites from pollen sources. The step function that seems to characterize pollen distribution patterns implies that pollen from distant populations may be of little value in interpreting vegetation stability and change reflected by fossil pollen stratigraphy. The physical isolation of pollen embedded in the local mountain-valley wind system from that in the prevailing westerlies may explain part of the spatial distribution of the pollen.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0033-5894(86)90053-0

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Whitney, 1979, The Sierra Nevada
  2. U.S. Department of the Interior, 1981, Bishop, California, Wind Data Tapes
  3. Baker, 1983, Holocene vegetation history of the western United States, Late-Quaternary Environments of the United States, Vol. 2, 109
  4. Kuchler, 1977, The map of the natural vegetation of California, Terrestrial Vegetation of California, 909
  5. 10.1175/1520-0450(1977)016<0571:AMMFDA>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1977)016
  6. Greenland, 1979, Modeling Air Pollution Potential for Mountain Resorts
  7. Spaulding, 1983, Late Wisconsin paleoecology of the American Southwest, Late-Quaternary Environments of the United States, Vol. 1, 159
  8. Martin, 1965, Pollen analysis and biogeography of the Southwest, The Quaternary of the United States, 433
  9. Solomon, 1979, Palynology models, Aerobiology: The Ecological Systems Approach, 338
  10. Geiger, 1966, The Climate Near the Ground
  11. Solomon, 1979, Sources and characteristics of airborne materials: Pollen, Aerobiology: The Ecological Systems Approach, 41
  12. Orgill, 1971, Laboratory Simulation and Field Estimates of Atmospheric Transport-Dispersion over Mountainous Terrain
  13. Holzworth, 1972, Mixing Heights, Wind Speeds, and Potential for Urban Air Pollution throughout the Contiguous United States
  14. 10.2307/1550475 · DOI
  15. Huber, 1976, Plume behavior in the lee of a mountain ridge: A wind tunnel study, Proceedings of the Conference on Environmental Modeling and Simulation, 493

Cited by

See all 55

Metadata

Authors
Solomon, A. M., & Silkworth, A. B.
Venue
Quaternary Research
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1986-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
150-162
ISSN
  • 0033-5894
  • 1096-0287
DOI
10.1016/0033-5894(86)90053-0
Cited by
55
References
41
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 11283 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.