Cited by 53High Altitude and HypoxiaPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Efficiency of parabronchial gas exchange in deep hypoxia: measurements in the resting duck

Shams, H., Scheid, P.·1989·Respiration Physiology

Abstract

Cardio-respiratory parameters and air sac and blood gases were measured in the unrestrained, unanesthetized duck during exposure to varied levels of inspired hypoxia. As ventilation increased with hypoxia, the gas partial pressures in the air sacs and in arterial blood approached the inspired values, the differences being less than 3 Torr for air sacs and less than 5 Torr for arterial blood. To analyze the relative significance of ventilation, diffusion and perfusion in limiting parabronchial gas exchange, the conductances for ventilation (Gvent), diffusion (Gdiff = O2 diffusing capacity) and perfusion (Gperf) were calculated at all hypoxic levels. With increasing hypoxia, down to PIO2 = 50 Torr, all three conductances increased. Whereas Gvent continued to increase beyond this level, Gdiff remained constant, at about 0.27 mmol.min-1.Torr-1, while Gperf decreased, from a value of 0.22 mmol.min-1.Torr-1 at PIO2 = 50 Torr to 0.12 mmol.min-1.Torr-1 at PIO2 = 30 Torr. This reduction in Gperf may result from a direct hypoxic effect on the heart. Whereas ventilation is the main limiting factor for parabronchial gas exchange at rest down to hypoxia levels of PIO2 = 50 Torr, perfusion becomes the main limiting factor at deeper hypoxia. It is suggested that the higher tolerance of hypoxia exhibited by birds compared to mammals is not due to the higher efficiency of parabronchial compared with alveolar gas exchange, but reflects the ability of birds to tolerate lower arterial PCO2 level…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0034-5687(89)90001-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During deep hypoxia, respiration is ultimately limited by blood perfusion.

    “During deep hypoxia, however, respiration is ultimately limited by blood perfusion (Fedde et al., 1989;Shams and Scheid, 1989).”

    From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Shams and Scheid, 1989

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shams, H., & Scheid, P.
Affiliations
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Shams, H.
Venue
Respiration Physiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-08
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
135-146
ISSN
0034-5687 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997066758
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 21 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Respiration Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › High Altitude and Hypoxia
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
ducks, oxygen diffusion capacity, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, arterial PCO2, respiratory physiology
MeSH terms
Animals, Bronchi, Ducks, Oxygen, Pulmonary Gas Exchange

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review