Cited by 223High Altitude and HypoxiaPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsHemoglobin structure and function

Oxygen transport during progressive hypoxia in high-altitude and sea-level waterfowl

Black, Craig Patrick, Tenney, S.M.·1980·Respiration Physiology

Abstract

Under conditions of progressive hypoxia, oxygen transport was compared in bar-headed geese (Anser indicus), a species which breeds on the Tibetan Plateau and migrates at altitudes up to 9200 m, and Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos, forma domestica), a similarly sized, sea-level water fowl that does not fly. Pekin ducks showed no altitude-induced behavioral effects (e.g., restlessness) up to 7620 m, while bar-headed geese tolerated 10,668 m with no observable behavioral changes. Ventilatory and cardiac responses to hypoxia as functions of PaO2 followed a typical hyperbolic contour, but the response began at almost 20 Torr lower in the bar-headed goose. Both ventilation and cardiac output appeared to follow a common response curve for the two species, when the independent variable was expressed as arterial oxygen content. The goose had a high oxygen affinity hemoglobin, compared with the duck; the oxyhemoglobin curves of both shifted slightly to the right as a result of acclimation to 5640 m; but only the duck developed erythrocytosis as a consequence of acclimation. Under sea level conditions the duck maintained a higher mixed venous PO2, but with acute hypoxic exposures PVO2 was higher in the goose. Following acclimation, cardiac output in the duck was lower than in pre-acclimatized state, but in the goose it was higher up to the altitude at which it migrates. The selective pressures leading to the evolution of favorable oxygen transport in the bar-headed goose are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0034-5687(80)90046-8

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-elevation taxa such as the bar-headed goose possess hemoglobin with higher baseline affinity for oxygen.

    “but high-elevation taxa such as the bar-headed goose possess hemoglobin with higher baseline affinity for oxygen (Black and Tenney, 1980).”

    From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Black and Tenney, 1980

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Black, C. P., & Tenney, S. M.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Respiration Physiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-02
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
217-239
ISSN
0034-5687 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014527222
Cited by
223
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Respiration Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › High Altitude and Hypoxia
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hemoglobin structure and function
Keywords
oxygen transport, high altitude, bar-headed goose, Anser indicus, Pekin ducks, Anas platyrhynchos, hemoglobin oxygen affinity, erythrocytosis, cardiac output, ventilation, arterial oxygen content, bird migration, Tibetan Plateau
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Altitude, Animals, Hypoxia, Cardiac Output, Ducks, Geese, Oxygen, Respiration, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review