Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurotoxicity in animals due to arteether and artemether

Brewer, Thomas G., Peggins, James O., Grate, Stephen J., Petras, J.M., Levine, Barry S., Weina, Peter J., Swearengen, James, Heiffer, Melvin H., Schuster, Brian G.·1994·Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Several artemisinin (qinghaosu) derivatives have been developed and are in use as antimalarial drugs but scant animal or human toxicity data are available. We noted a progressive syndrome of clinical neurological defects with cardio-respiratory collapse and death in 5/6 dogs dosed daily for 8 d with intramuscular arteether (AE) at 20 mg/kg/d in a pharmacokinetic study. Neurological findings included gait disturbances, loss of spinal reflexes, pain response reflexes and prominent loss of brain-stem and eye reflexes. Electrocardiography showed prolongation of the QT interval corrected for rate (QTc). Prominent neuropathic lesions were sharply limited to the pons and medulla. Neurological injury, graded by a pathologist ‘blinded’ to dose group, showed a dose-related region-specific injury which was most pronounced in the pons and medulla in all animals. Rats treated with AE and artemether (AM) at 12·5 to 50 mg/kg/d for 28 d confirmed clinical neurological abnormalities with high doses (>25 mg/kg/d) after 6–14 d. Neuropathological examination of rat brain sections at 5 levels from the rostral cerebrum to the caudal medulla showed a dose-related pattern of injury characterized by hyalinized neuron cell bodies and loss of Nissl substance; changes congruent with those noted in dogs. No significant difference was noted in the extent, type, or distribution of lesions in the brains of rats treated with equivalent doses of AE or AM. We conclude that (i) a neurological syndrome with central nervous system neuropathological changes occurred in a dose-related, and anatomically specific manner in both dogs and rats given moderately high daily doses of AE or AM; (ii) prolonged QTc interval was a preterminal clinical finding in dogs and rats treated with high dose AE; (iii) the mechanism and aetiology of these lesions was not determined in this study but a long-lived toxic drug metabolite is suggested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0035-9203(94)90469-3

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Brewer, T. G., Peggins, J. O., Grate, S. J., Petras, J. M., Levine, B. S., Weina, P. J., Swearengen, J., Heiffer, M. H., & Schuster, B. G.
Venue
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
1994-06
Volume
88
Pages
33-36
ISSN
0035-9203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996976640
Cited by
254
References
4
FWCI
19.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurotoxicity in animals due to arteether and artemether. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0035-9203(94)90469-3
The paper
Brewer, T. G., Peggins, J. O., Grate, S. J., Petras, J. M., Levine, B. S., Weina, P. J., Swearengen, J., Heiffer, M. H., & Schuster, B. G. (1994). Neurotoxicity in animals due to arteether and artemether. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1016/0035-9203(94)90469-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.