Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,214

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the validity of the hall-petch relationship in nanocrystalline materials

Open access
Chokshi, A.H., Rosen, A., Karch, J., Gleiter, H.·1989·Scripta Metallurgica

Abstract

Etude experimentale de la variation de la durete en fonction de la grosseur de grain pour des materiaux nanocristallins. En contraste avec la relation de Hall-Petch, cette analyse, realisee sur le cuivre et le palladium a la temperature ambiante, montre un decroissement de la durete lorsque la grosseur de grain decroit. Ces resultats sont expliques en termes d'apparition d'un fluage diffusionnel, a la temperature ambiante, dans les materiaux a grains ultrafins

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,214

Metadata

Authors
Chokshi, A. H., Rosen, A., Karch, J., & Gleiter, H.
Venue
Scripta Metallurgica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-10
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1679-1683
ISSN
0036-9748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974532467
Cited by
1,214
References
0
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the validity of the hall-petch relationship in nanocrystalline materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-6
The paper
Chokshi, A. H., Rosen, A., Karch, J., & Gleiter, H. (1989). On the validity of the hall-petch relationship in nanocrystalline materials. Scripta Metallurgica. https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.