The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effects of clearing and cropping on the organic reserves and biomass of tropical forest soils
Open accessAbstract
Twenty Nigerian soil samples, mainly from field experiments at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), were used in a study of the effects of clearing and cropping on the C, N and S reserves of soils under secondary lowland rain forest. Soils that had been cropped for 2yr usually contained less total C and N than the corresponding forest soils. This decline was less rapid when crop residues (maize) were returned to the soil as a mulch than when they were removed. The soils were incubated in the laboratory either fresh, or after exposure to stress treatments (air-drying or fumigation). The amounts of N mineralised by the fresh untreated soils were small and not clearly related to the cropping history. Both air-drying and fumigation caused a marked increase in the mineralisation of N and the amount released was related to the cropping history. Cropping caused an even greater decrease in these ‘stress-labile’ N reserves than in total soil N, so that cropping causes a decline in both the quantity and “quality’ of soil organic matter. Again, the decline was less where crops were grown under mulches. A term “Per cent Stress-labile N” (PSN), defined as the percentage of the total N mineralised when fumigated soil is incubated under defined conditions, is proposed as a measure of the ‘quality’ of soil organic nitrogen. Under secondary forest the PSN ranged from 3.4–4.2%; on cultivation it declined, in one case to less than 1%. The amount of C in the soil biomass was calculated from the size of the flush of decomposition caused by fumigation. Biomass C usually decreased on cultivation, the decrease being less under mulches. There was a close linear relationship ( r = 0.94) between the flush of N caused by fumigation and the amount of biomass C in a soil and a rough measure of biomass C can be obtained by multiplying the N flush by 8.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The fumigation-extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: Calibration of the kEN value
Joergensen, R. G., & Mueller, T. (1996) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(95)00101-8 · Cited by 1,364
Powlson, D. S., Prookes, P. C., & Christensen, B. T. (1987) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90076-9 · Cited by 1,111
Murty, D., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Mcmurtrie, R. E., & Mcgilvray, H. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00459.x · Cited by 996
McGILL, W. B., CANNON, K. R., ROBERTSON, J. A., & COOK, F. D. (1986) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss86-001 · Cited by 629
Lavelle, P., Blanchart, E., Martin, A., Martin, S., & Spain, A. (1993) · Biotropica · doi:10.2307/2389178 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayanaba, A., tuckwell, S. B., & jenkinson, D. S.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1976-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 519-525
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081754712
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of clearing and cropping on the organic reserves and biomass of tropical forest soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90095-x
- The paper
- Ayanaba, A., tuckwell, S. B., & jenkinson, D. S. (1976). The effects of clearing and cropping on the organic reserves and biomass of tropical forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90095-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.