Cited by 996Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen? a review of the literature

Murty, Danuse, Kirschbaum, Miko U. F., Mcmurtrie, Ross E., Mcgilvray, Heather·2002·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Soil carbon is a large component of the global carbon cycle and its management can significantly affect the atmospheric CO 2 concentration. An important management issue is the extent of soil carbon (C) release when forest is converted to agricultural land. We reviewed the literature to assess changes in soil C upon conversion of forests to agricultural land. Analyses are confounded by changes in soil bulk density upon land‐use change, with agricultural soils on average having 13% higher bulk density. Consistent with earlier reviews, we found that conversion of forest to cultivated land led to an average loss of approximately 30% of soil C. When we restricted our analysis to studies that had used appropriate corrections for changes in bulk density, soil C loss was 22%. When, from all the studies compiled, we considered only studies reporting both soil C and nitrogen (N), average losses of C and N were 24% and 15%, respectively, hence showing a decrease in the average C : N ratio. The magnitude of these changes in the C : N ratio did not correlate with either C or N changes. When considering the transition from forest to pasture, there was no significant change in either soil C or N, even though reported changes in soil C ranged from −50% to +160%. Among studies that reported changes in soil N as well as soil C, C : N ratios both increased and decreased, with trends depending on changes in system N. Systems with increasing soil N generally had decreased C : N ratios, whereas s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00459.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murty, D., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Mcmurtrie, R. E., & Mcgilvray, H.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Murty, Danuse
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
105-123
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2089175197
Cited by
996
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 42
FWCI
24.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
soil carbon, soil nitrogen, land use change, forest conversion, cropland, pasture, bulk density, C/N ratio, soil carbon loss, fertiliser application, carbon cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review