The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laboratory Guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex
Genin, S., & Denny, T. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173000 · Cited by 666
Field study reveals core plant microbiota and relative importance of their drivers
Hamonts, K., Trivedi, P., Garg, A., Janitz, C., Grinyer, J., Holford, P., Botha, F. C., Anderson, I. C., & Singh, B. K. (2018) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14031 · Cited by 398
Effect of silver nanoparticles on Oryza sativa L. and its rhizosphere bacteria
Mirzajani, F., Askari, H., Hamzelou, S., Farzaneh, M., & Ghassempour, A. (2013) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.10.018 · Cited by 353
Pantoea ananatis : an unconventional plant pathogen
COUTINHO, T. A., & VENTER, S. N. (2009) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00542.x · Cited by 321
Palleroni, N. J. (2015) · Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria · doi:10.1002/9781118960608.gbm01210 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Keane, P. J.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1981-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 559
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321157087
- Cited by
- 1,326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory Guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0038-0717(81)90055-9
- The paper
- Keane, P. J. (1981). Laboratory Guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(81)90055-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
