The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Field study reveals core plant microbiota and relative importance of their drivers
Abstract
Summary: Harnessing plant microbiota can assist in sustainably increasing primary productivity to meet growing global demands for food and biofuel. However, development of rational microbiome‐based approaches for improving crop yield and productivity is currently hindered by a lack of understanding of the major biotic and abiotic factors shaping the crop microbiome under relevant field conditions. We examined bacterial and fungal communities associated with both aerial (leaves, stalks) and belowground (roots, soil) compartments of four commercial sugarcane varieties ( Saccharum spp.) grown in several growing regions in Australia. We identified drivers of the sugarcane microbiome under field conditions and evaluated whether the plants shared a core microbiome. Sugarcane‐associated microbial assemblages were primarily determined by plant compartment, followed by growing region, crop age, variety and Yellow Canopy Syndrome (YCS). We detected a core set of microbiota and identified members of the core microbiome that were influenced by YCS incidence. Our study revealed key hub microorganisms in the core microbiome networks of sugarcane leaves, stalks, roots and rhizosphere soil despite location and time‐associated shifts in the community assemblages. Elucidating their functional roles and identification of the keystone core microbiota that sustain plant health could provide a technological breakthrough for a sustainable increase in crop productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M., & Cole, J. R. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00062-07 · Cited by 19,885
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., et al. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01541-09 · Cited by 19,549
UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads
Edgar, R. C. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2604 · Cited by 16,707
FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies
Magoč, T., & Salzberg, S. L. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 · Cited by 15,366
UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection
Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C., & Knight, R. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 · Cited by 15,114
Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure
CLARKE, K. R. (1993) · Australian Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x · Cited by 14,128
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828
Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation
Clarke, K. R., & Warwick, R. M. (2001) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 12,075
Cited by
Climate change impacts on plant pathogens, food security and paths forward
Singh, B. K., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Egidi, E., Guirado, E., Leach, J. E., Liu, H., & Trivedi, P. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-023-00900-7 · Cited by 1,334
Self-citationHost selection shapes crop microbiome assembly and network complexity
Xiong, C., Zhu, Y., Wang, J., Singh, B., Han, L., Shen, J., Li, P., Wang, G., Wu, C., Ge, A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.16890 · Cited by 710
Self-citationEnabling sustainable agriculture through understanding and enhancement of microbiomes
Trivedi, P., Mattupalli, C., Eversole, K., & Leach, J. E. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17319 · Cited by 348
Self-citationAbundance-occupancy distributions to prioritize plant core microbiome membership
Shade, A., & Stopnisek, N. (2019) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2019.09.008 · Cited by 264
Zhang, L., Zhang, M., Huang, S., Li, L., Gao, Q., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Huang, S., Yuan, L., Wen, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31113-w · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamonts, K., Trivedi, P., Garg, A., Janitz, C., Grinyer, J., Holford, P., Botha, F. C., Anderson, I. C., & Singh, B. K.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 124-140
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2779346378
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 15.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field study reveals core plant microbiota and relative importance of their drivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1462-2920.14031
- The paper
- Hamonts, K., Trivedi, P., Garg, A., Janitz, C., Grinyer, J., Holford, P., Botha, F. C., Anderson, I. C., & Singh, B. K. (2018). Field study reveals core plant microbiota and relative importance of their drivers. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
