Cited by 219Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

N2O and CH4 fluxes in soil influenced by fertilization and tractor traffic

Hansen, S., Mæhlum, J.E., Bakken, L.R.·1993·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

The effects of fertilization and tractor traffic on N2O emission and CH4 uptake in agricultural soil were studied in a field trial with different fertilization and soil compaction. The soil was a well-drained sandy loam and the crop rotation was rich in ley and legumes. The fertilization treatments were: NPK fertilizer (140kg NH4NO3-N ha-1); cattle slurry (CS) (189kg total N ha-1), CS (81 kg total N ha-1), and an unfertilized treatment. The soil was experimentally compacted by two passes with a tractor, wheel by wheel, shortly before fertilization. Gas fluxes at the soil surface were measured by the soil cover method. Soil air at a depth of 7-12 cm was sampled through stationary soil air samplers. Concentrations of N2O in soil air were more than seven times higher in compacted, NPK-fertilized soil than in any other treatments. Maximum concentrations (1900 microliters N2O l-1) were observed shortly after periods with heavy rain. The accumulated N2O emissions from the NPK-fertilized treatment (4 June-8 July) corresponded to 5.3% of added NH4NO3-N in compacted soil, and 3.9% in uncompacted soil. Fertilization with cattle slurry equivalent to 81 kg total N ha-1 gave an N2O emission corresponding to 3.1% of added NH4-N in uncompacted soil, and 2.7% in compacted soil. Increasing levels of cattle slurry resulted in a reduction in N2O emission per kg NH4-N added. The accumulated CH4 Uptake (4 June-8 July) in the soil was 9.7 mg CH4 m-2 in unfertilized and uncompacted soil. It was reduced by 52% by soil compaction. 50% on average by fertilization and 78% by soil compaction and fertilization combined. Fertilization with NH4NO3 or cattle slurry resulted in similar effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90202-m

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, S., Mæhlum, J. E., & Bakken, L. R.
Corresponding author
Hansen, S.
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-05
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
621-630
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035402037
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 16
FWCI
23.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
nitrous oxide emissions, methane uptake, soil gas flux, soil compaction, tractor traffic, fertilization, cattle slurry, ammonium nitrate, agricultural soils, soil gas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review