The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Agronomic applications of azospirillum: An evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Steenhoudt, O., & Vanderleyden, J. (2000) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00036-x · Cited by 992
Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions
DIMKPA, C., WEINAND, T., & ASCH, F. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x · Cited by 963
Root phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: an underexploited opportunity for global agriculture
Lynch, J. P. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15738 · Cited by 774
MECHANISMS AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS INVOLVED IN PLANT GROWTH PROMOTION BY RHIZOBACTERIA
Martínez-Viveros, O., Jorquera, M. A., Crowley, D. E., Gajardo, G., & Mora, M. L. (2010) · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition · doi:10.4067/s0718-95162010000100006 · Cited by 688
Metadata
- Authors
- Okon, Y., & Labandera-Gonzalez, C. A.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1591-1601
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034761695
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agronomic applications of azospirillum: An evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0038-0717(94)90311-5
- The paper
- Okon, Y., & Labandera-Gonzalez, C. A. (1994). Agronomic applications of azospirillum: An evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)90311-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
