The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Values based on the STRs for the Hazaras, Parsis, Kalash, and Burushos were 8.9, 77.5, 25.8, and 74.2, respectively, compared with a mean of 181.8 for the other populations with sample sizes 1 20.”
From Y-chromosomal DNA variation in Pakistan (2002) · cites this paper as Ewens V k 1972
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Crow, 1964, The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population, Genetics, 49, 725, 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725 · DOI
- Karlin, 1972, Addendum to a paper of W. Ewens, Theor. Pop. Biol, 3, 10.1016/0040-5809(72)90036-6 · DOI
- Wright, 1931, Evolution in Mendelian Populations, Genetics, 16, 97, 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 · DOI
Cited by
SAMPLING VARIANCES OF HETEROZYGOSITY AND GENETIC DISTANCE
Nei, M., & Roychoudhury, A. K. (1974) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/76.2.379 · Cited by 1,641
Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution
OHTA, T. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/246096a0 · Cited by 1,104
Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination
Hudson, R. R. (1983) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(83)90013-8 · Cited by 816
Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models
Rocher, L., Hendrickx, J. M., & de Montjoye, Y.-A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10933-3 · Cited by 816
Stinchcombe, J. R., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2008) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800937 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Ewens, W. J.
- Venue
- Theoretical Population Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1972-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-112
- ISSN
- 0040-5809
- Cited by
- 1,640
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0040-5809(72)90035-4
- The paper
- Ewens, W. J. (1972). The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theoretical Population Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(72)90035-4