Cited by 190Geometric and Algebraic TopologyHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic TopologyAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models

Skein theory and Turaev-Viro invariants

Open access
Roberts, Justin·1995·Topology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0040-9383(94)00053-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For a closed three-manifold M, the Turaev-Viro amplitude, interpreted as a partition function, is equal to the absolute square of the partition function of an SU(2) Chern-Simons theory with coupling constant k.

    “For a closed three-manifold M, the Turaev-Viro amplitude — now interpreted as a partition function — is equal to the absolute square of the partition function of an SU(2) Chern-Simons theory with coupling constant k [228, 260, 233],”

    From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [233]

    The Introduction states that the Turaev–Viro invariant equals the squared modulus of the Reshetikhin–Turaev invariant, and §3.4 gives a proof in the paper’s skein-theoretic formulation. The copy identifies the SU(2) case but does not explicitly identify that invariant as a Chern–Simons partition function with coupling constant k; that part of the attributed claim is not established by the copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. F. J. ARCHER: A simplicial approach to topological quantum field theory, Thesis, University of Cambridge (1993).
  2. B. BRODA: Surgical invariants of 4-manifolds, preprint (1993).
  3. E. CBSAR DE S.&I A link calculus for 4-manifolds, in Topology 01 low-dimensional manfolds, R. Fenn, Ed., Springer Lecture Notes in Maths, Vol. 722, Springer, Berlin (1979).
  4. L. CRANE, L. H. KAUFFMAN and D. N. YETTER: Calculating the Crane-Yetter invariant, in Quantum topology, Baadhio and Kauffman, Eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1993).
  5. L. CRANE and D. N. YETTER: A categorical construction of 4d topological quantum field theories, in Quantum topology, Baadhio and Kauffman, Eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1993).
  6. L. H. KAUFFMAN: Knots and physics, World Scientific, Singapore (1991).
  7. L. H. KAUFFMAN and S. L. LINS: Temperley-Lieb recoupling theory and invariants of 3-manifolds, Ann. Math. Study, Vol. 134, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994).
  8. R. C. KIRBY: A calculus for framed links in S3, Invent. Math. 45 (1978), 35-56.
  9. R. C. KIRBY: Topology of Cmanifolds, Springer Lecture Notes in Maths, Vol. 1374, Springer, Berlin (1989).
  10. A. N. KIR~LLOV and N. Y. RESHETIKHIN: Representations of the algebra U&[(2)), q-orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links, in Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and groups, V. G. Kac, Ed., World Scientific, Singapore (1989).
  11. W. B. R. LICKORISH: Three-manifolds and the Temperley-Lieb algebra, Math. Ann. 290 (1990), 657-670.
  12. W. B. R. IXKORISH: Calculations with the Temperley-Lieb algebra, Comm. Math. Helv. 67 (1992), 571-591. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.
  13. W. B. R. LICKORISH: Skeins and handlebodies, Pac. J. Much. 159 (1993), 337-349.
  14. W. B. R. LICKORISH: The skein method for 3-manifold invariants, J. Knot Th. Ram. 2 (1993), 171-194.
  15. U. PACHNER: PL homeomorphic manifolds are equivalent by elementary shelling, Europ. J. Combin. 12 (1991), 129-145.
  16. S. PIUNIKHIN: Turaev-Viro and Kauffman invariants coincide, J. Knot Th. Ram. 1 (1992), 105-136.
  17. N. Y. RESHETIKHIN and V. G. TURAEV: Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups, Invent. Math. 103 (1991), 547-597.
  18. J. D. ROBERTS: Refinements of state-sum invariants, in Proceedings of 1993 Georgia Topology Conference, to appear.
  19. V. G. TURAEV: Topology of shadows, preprint (1992).
  20. V. G. TURAEV and 0. Y. VIRO: State-sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols, Topology 31 (1992), 865-902.
  21. K. WALKER: On Witten's 3-maiifold invariants, preprint (1991).
  22. E. WITTEN: On quantum gauge theories in two dimensions, Comm. Mnth. Phys. 141 (1991), 153-209.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Justin
Venue
Topology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-10
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
771-787
ISSN
0040-9383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106021864
Cited by
190
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Topology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Keywords
skein theory, Turaev-Viro invariants, quantum invariants of 3-manifolds, knot theory, 3-manifold invariants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review