Determination of the ionization gauge sensitivity using the relative ionization cross-section
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emission currents are usually increased at low pressure to increase the ion current at the collector and to reduce the effects of ions created by electron stimulated desorption (ESD).
“Emission currents are usually increased at low pressure to increase the ion current at the collector and to reduce the effects of ion created by electron stimulated desorption (ESD).15”
From Review Article: Recommended practice for calibrating vacuum gauges of the ionization type (2018) · cites this paper as [15]
The gauge sensitivity strongly depends on the ionization probability of the calibration gas.
“The gauge sensitivity strongly depends on the ionization probability of the calibration gas.”
From Review Article: Recommended practice for calibrating vacuum gauges of the ionization type (2018) · cites this paper as [15]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jousten, K., Boineau, F., Bundaleski, N., Illgen, C., Setina, J., Teodoro, O. M. N. D., Vicar, M., & Wüest, M. (2020) · Vacuum · doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109545 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Review Article: Recommended practice for calibrating vacuum gauges of the ionization type
Fedchak, J. A., Abbott, P. J., Hendricks, J. H., Arnold, P. C., & Peacock, N. T. (2018) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films · doi:10.1116/1.5025060 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nakao, F.
- Venue
- Vacuum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 431-435
- ISSN
- 0042-207X
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
