The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rapid bacteriophage sedimentation in the presence of polyethylene glycol and its application to large-scale virus purification
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Bacteriophages may be readily concentrated from crude lysates of infected bacteria after addition of polyethylene glycol (PEG). A general procedure is presented which can be used for lysate volumes of 17 liters or more with nearly quantitative recovery of infectivity over a wide range of phage titers (105 to 1013 PFU/ml). All the bacteriophages tested (λ, T4, T7, P22, fd, φX174, R17) are efficiently removed from solution by simple settling at concentrations of PEG 6000 between 2% and 10%. Bacteriophage pellets are redissolved in a small amount of buffer, allowing 100-fold concentration of the original lysate. While lower molecular weight polyethylene glycols are much less effective for concentrating bacteriophages than the PEG 6000 used, the efficiency is relatively insensitive to changes in pH and ionic strength. Asymmetric particles (tobacco mosaic virus and bacteriophage fd) are especially susceptible to PEG, and they can be purified from more symmetrical particles at low PEG 6000 concentrations (2% or less). Although the exact mechanism by which bacteriophages can be concentrated with PEG is unknown, a phase partition rather than a normal precipitation reaction seems to be involved, since the fraction of infective phages removed from solution by a fixed concentration of PEG is nearly invariant to changes in bacteriophage concentration over as much as a 108-fold range. Extension of this method to concentration and purification of other viruses and nucleic acids, as well as some preliminary mechanistic studies, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DNA N-glycosidases: properties of uracil-DNA glycosidase from Escherichia coli.
Lindahl, T., Ljungquist, S., Siegert, W., Nyberg, B., & Sperens, B. (1977) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)40386-3 · Cited by 522
Phage Choice, Isolation, and Preparation for Phage Therapy
Gill, J., & Hyman, P. (2010) · Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · doi:10.2174/138920110790725311 · Cited by 441
The significance of exosomes in the development and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
Li, X., Li, C., Zhang, L., Wu, M., Cao, K., Jiang, F., Chen, D., Li, N., & Li, W. (2020) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-019-1085-0 · Cited by 395
Iredale, J. P., Benyon, R. C., Arthur, M. J., Ferris, W. F., Alcolado, R., Winwood, P. J., Clark, N., & Murphy, G. (1996) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.510240129 · Cited by 324
Standardized bacteriophage purification for personalized phage therapy
Luong, T., Salabarria, A.-C., Edwards, R. A., & Roach, D. R. (2020) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-0346-0 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamamoto, K. R., Alberts, B. M., Benzinger, R., Lawhorne, L., & Treiber, G.
- Venue
- Virology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1970-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 734-744
- ISSN
- 0042-6822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021272316
- Cited by
- 1,565
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 95.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid bacteriophage sedimentation in the presence of polyethylene glycol and its application to large-scale virus purification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0042-6822(70)90218-7
- The paper
- Yamamoto, K. R., Alberts, B. M., Benzinger, R., Lawhorne, L., & Treiber, G. (1970). Rapid bacteriophage sedimentation in the presence of polyethylene glycol and its application to large-scale virus purification. Virology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(70)90218-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.