Cited by 274Bacteriophages and microbial interactionsVirus-based gene therapy researchPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies

Standardized bacteriophage purification for personalized phage therapy

Luong, Tiffany, Salabarria, Ann-Charlott, Edwards, Robert A., Roach, Dwayne R.·2020·Nature Protocols

Abstract

The world is on the cusp of a post-antibiotic era, but researchers and medical doctors have found a way forward-by looking back at how infections were treated before the advent of antibiotics, namely using phage therapy. Although bacteriophages (phages) continue to lack drug approval in Western medicine, an increasing number of patients are being treated on an expanded-access emergency investigational new drug basis. To streamline the production of high-quality and clinically safe phage preparations, we developed a systematic procedure for medicinal phage isolation, liter-scale cultivation, concentration and purification. The 16- to 21-day procedure described in this protocol uses a combination of modified classic techniques, modern membrane filtration processes and no organic solvents to yield on average 23 mL of 10 11 plaque-forming units (PFUs) per milliliter for Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, and Serratia phages tested. Thus, a single production run can produce up to 64,000 treatment doses at 10 9 PFUs, which would be sufficient for most expanded-access phage therapy cases and potentially for clinical phase I/II applications. The protocol focuses on removing endotoxins early by conducting multiple low-speed centrifugations, microfiltration, and cross-flow ultrafiltration, which reduced endotoxins by up to 10 6 -fold in phage preparations. Implementation of a standardized phage cultivation and purification across research laboratories participating in phage production for expand…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41596-020-0346-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luong, T., Salabarria, A.-C., Edwards, R. A., & Roach, D. R.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Roach, Dwayne R.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2020-07-24
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
2867-2890
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W3045043630
Cited by
274
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 2
FWCI
15.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (RC2DK116713)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
phage therapy, phage purification, phage isolation, endotoxin removal, personalized phage therapy, Pseudomonas phages, membrane filtration, cross-flow ultrafiltration, post-antibiotic era
MeSH terms
Phage Therapy, Bacteriophages, Quality Control, Reference Standards, Viral Proteins, Culture Techniques, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review