Parallel visual pathways: A review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The M-pathway has properties such as speed of processing and low spatial resolution that make it a suitable physiological substrate for gain control.
“The M-pathway has several properties (speed of processing, low spatial resolution) that make it a suitable physiological substrate for gain control (39).”
From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 242 · Cited by 509
- Authors
- Lennie, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lennie, Peter
- ORCID
- Lennie, Peter
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 561-594
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089325630
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 242
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 16.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vision Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Keywords
- parallel visual pathways, visual system organization, dorsal stream, ventral stream, visual processing
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Cats, Flicker Fusion, Geniculate Bodies, Macaca, Motion Perception, Neural Conduction, Neurons, Optic Nerve, Retina, Size Perception, Space Perception, Time Factors, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
