Cited by 244Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsOcular Disorders and Treatments

Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken

Schaeffel, Frank, Howland, Howard C.·1991·Vision Research

Abstract

Recent experiments in chickens provide evidence that axial eye growth and refractive state are guided by mechanisms sensitive to refractive error. To determine whether or not the sign of refractive error is derived from longitudinal chromatic aberration we raised chicks with spectacle lenses in monochromatic light. The eyes showed an appropriate growth response to correct for the defocus imposed by the lenses no different than in previous experiments in white light. Thus, in normally accommodating chicks chromatic cues are not necessary for emmetropization to occur. We examined the linearity of feedback loops controlling axial eye growth: positive spectacle lenses were found to inhibit axial growth very efficiently making the eyes shorter than normal whereas negative lenses had little effect on axial elongation: feedback loops for regulation of axial growth are highly nonlinear and act most efficiently on the myopic side. We found that, subsequent to a period of binocular deprivation of form vision, the refractive errors acquired are highly correlated in both eyes. Since both eyes grew without visual feedback we conclude that the gains in the feedback loops that control axial growth must be similar in both eyes. We suggest that the gains are genetically determined and are typical for each individual. Chicks made near-sighted in both eyes by "deprivation of form vision" were corrected by appropriate negative lenses. Three out of five chicks recovered from myopia despite the co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90011-s

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaeffel, F., & Howland, H. C.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Schaeffel, Frank
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
717-734
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067666500
Cited by
244
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (EY 02994, R01EY002994)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Ocular Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
eye growth, refractive error, emmetropization, myopia, hyperopia, spectacle lenses, chromatic aberration, binocular deprivation, form vision, feedback loops, chickens
MeSH terms
Animals, Chickens, Eye, Feedback, Light, Refractive Errors, Sensory Deprivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review