Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken
Abstract
Recent experiments in chickens provide evidence that axial eye growth and refractive state are guided by mechanisms sensitive to refractive error. To determine whether or not the sign of refractive error is derived from longitudinal chromatic aberration we raised chicks with spectacle lenses in monochromatic light. The eyes showed an appropriate growth response to correct for the defocus imposed by the lenses no different than in previous experiments in white light. Thus, in normally accommodating chicks chromatic cues are not necessary for emmetropization to occur. We examined the linearity of feedback loops controlling axial eye growth: positive spectacle lenses were found to inhibit axial growth very efficiently making the eyes shorter than normal whereas negative lenses had little effect on axial elongation: feedback loops for regulation of axial growth are highly nonlinear and act most efficiently on the myopic side. We found that, subsequent to a period of binocular deprivation of form vision, the refractive errors acquired are highly correlated in both eyes. Since both eyes grew without visual feedback we conclude that the gains in the feedback loops that control axial growth must be similar in both eyes. We suggest that the gains are genetically determined and are typical for each individual. Chicks made near-sighted in both eyes by "deprivation of form vision" were corrected by appropriate negative lenses. Three out of five chicks recovered from myopia despite the co…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus
Schaeffel, F., Troilo, D., Wallman, J., & Howland, H. C. (1990) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800002327 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia
Troilo, D., Smith, E. L., Nickla, D. L., Ashby, R., Tkatchenko, A. V., Ostrin, L. A., Gawne, T. J., Pardue, M. T., Summers, J. A., Kee, C.-S., et al. (2019) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25967 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Chicks use changes in luminance and chromatic contrast as indicators of the sign of defocus
Rucker, F. J., & Wallman, J. (2012) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/12.6.23 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schaeffel, F., & Howland, H. C.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schaeffel, Frank
- ORCID
- Schaeffel, Frank
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 717-734
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067666500
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vision Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (EY 02994, R01EY002994)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Ocular Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- eye growth, refractive error, emmetropization, myopia, hyperopia, spectacle lenses, chromatic aberration, binocular deprivation, form vision, feedback loops, chickens
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chickens, Eye, Feedback, Light, Refractive Errors, Sensory Deprivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review