The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field”
Open accessAbstract
The Gestalt law of "good continuation" has been used to describe a variety of phenomena demonstrating the importance of continuity in human perception. In this study, we consider how continuity may be represented by a visual system that filters spatial data using arrays of cells selective for orientation and spatial frequency. Many structures (e.g. fractal contours) show a form of redundancy which is well represented by the continuity of features as they vary across space and frequency. We suggest that it is possible to take advantage of the redundancy in continuous, but non-aligned features by associating the outputs of filters with similar tuning. Five experiments were performed, to determine the rules that govern the perception of continuity. Observers were presented with arrays of oriented, band-pass elements (Gabor patches) in which a subset of the elements was aligned along a "jagged" path. Using a forced-choice procedure, observers were found to be capable of identifying the path within a field of randomly-oriented elements even when the spacing between the elements was considerably larger than the size of any of the individual elements. Furthermore, when the elements were oriented at angles up to +/- 60 deg relative to one another, the path was reliably identified. Alignment of the elements along the path was found to play a large role in the ability to detect the path. Small variations in the alignment or aligning the elements orthogonally (i.e. "side-to-side" as opposed to "end-to-end") significantly reduced the observer's ability to detect the presence of a path. The results are discussed in terms of an "association field" which integrates information across neighboring filters tuned to similar orientations. We suggest that some of the processes involved in texture segregation may have a similar explanation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0020 · Cited by 6,510
Cited by
Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology
(2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426 · Cited by 1,632
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0029333 · Cited by 1,539
Top-down influences on visual processing
Gilbert, C. D., & Li, W. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3476 · Cited by 1,224
Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex
Bosking, W. H., Zhang, Y., Schofield, B., & Fitzpatrick, D. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-06-02112.1997 · Cited by 1,119
Kapadia, M. K., Ito, M., Gilbert, C. D., & Westheimer, G. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90175-2 · Cited by 941
Metadata
- Authors
- Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-193
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075724496
- Cited by
- 1,614
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0042-6989(93)90156-q
- The paper
- Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F. (1993). Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field”. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(93)90156-q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.