The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability
Weibull, W. (1951) · Journal of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1115/1.4010337 · Cited by 11,604
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Transformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics
Levitt, H. (1971) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1912375 · Cited by 5,477
Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method
Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03202828 · Cited by 2,410
The Staircase-Method in Psychophysics
Cornsweet, T. N. (1962) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419876 · Cited by 1,330
THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY
Pelli, D. G., Robson, J. G., & Wilkins, A. J. (1988) · Cited by 1,308
SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION
Wetherill, G. B., & Levitt, H. (1965) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1965.tb00689.x · Cited by 1,196
PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions
Taylor, M. M., & Creelman, C. D. (1967) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1910407 · Cited by 1,173
Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST
Lieberman, H. R., & Pentland, A. P. (1982) · Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation · doi:10.3758/bf03202110 · Cited by 318
Neural Theories of Simple Visual Discriminations*†
Blackwell, H. R. (1963) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.53.000129 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection
Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.12.12 · Cited by 832
Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold
Kontsevich, L. L., & Tyler, C. W. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00285-5 · Cited by 668
Adaptive psychophysical procedures
Treutwein, B. (1995) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00016-s · Cited by 648
Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C., & Eckstein, M. (2000) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00024-9 · Cited by 477
Feature detection and letter identification
Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- King-Smith, P. E., Grigsby, S. S., Vingrys, A. J., Benes, S. C., & Supowit, A.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 885-912
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038070717
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0042-6989(94)90039-6
- The paper
- King-Smith, P. E., Grigsby, S. S., Vingrys, A. J., Benes, S. C., & Supowit, A. (1994). Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)90039-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
