The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature detection and letter identification
Open accessAbstract
Seeking to understand how people recognize objects, we have examined how they identify letters. We expected this 26-way classification of familiar forms to challenge the popular notion of independent feature detection ("probability summation"), but find instead that this theory parsimoniously accounts for our results. We measured the contrast required for identification of a letter briefly presented in visual noise. We tested a wide range of alphabets and scripts (English, Arabic, Armenian, Chinese, Devanagari, Hebrew, and several artificial ones), three- and five-letter words, and various type styles, sizes, contrasts, durations, and eccentricities, with observers ranging widely in age (3 to 68) and experience (none to fluent). Foreign alphabets are learned quickly. In just three thousand trials, new observers attain the same proficiency in letter identification as fluent readers. Surprisingly, despite this training, the observers-like clinical letter-by-letter readers-have the same meager memory span for random strings of these characters as observers seeing them for the first time. We compare performance across tasks and stimuli that vary in difficulty by pitting the human against the ideal observer, and expressing the results as efficiency. We find that efficiency for letter identification is independent of duration, overall contrast, and eccentricity, and only weakly dependent on size, suggesting that letters are identified by a similar computation across this wide range of viewing conditions. Efficiency is also independent of age and years of reading. However, efficiency does vary across alphabets and type styles, with more complex forms yielding lower efficiencies, as one might expect from Gestalt theories of perception. In fact, we find that efficiency is inversely proportional to perimetric complexity (perimeter squared over "ink" area) and nearly independent of everything else. This, and the surprisingly fixed ratio of detection and identification thresholds, indicate that identifying a letter is mediated by detection of about 7 visual features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,161
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,532
Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts
Belongie, S., Malik, J., & Puzicha, J. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.993558 · Cited by 6,306
Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory
Trees, H. L. V. (1968) · Cited by 5,969
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,674
Thompson, D. W. (2019) · Stripped Bare · doi:10.1515/9780691183978-018 · Cited by 4,177
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings
Campbell, F. W., & Robson, J. G. (1968) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008574 · Cited by 3,019
Cited by
Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis
Bosse, M.-L., Tainturier, M. J., & Valdois, S. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009 · Cited by 802
The spatial coding model of visual word identification.
Davis, C. J. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019738 · Cited by 490
Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T. D., & Majaj, N. J. (2007) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/7.2.20 · Cited by 380
Self-citationFoundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From?
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T. (2007) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210701703659 · Cited by 288
Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2016) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1081703 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 4646-4674
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138786365
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 105
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature detection and letter identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023
- The paper
- Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.