Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 495

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lymphocytic (“microscopic”) colitis: A comparative histopathologic study with particular reference to collagenous colitis

Open access
Lazenby, Audrey J., Yardley, John H., Giardiello, Francis M., Jessurun, Jose, Bayless, Theodore M.·1989·Human Pathology

Abstract

Lymphocytic colitis, previously termed "microscopic colitis", is a clinicopathologic syndrome of watery diarrhea, grossly normal colonoscopy, and mucosal inflammatory changes. Since lymphocytic colitis is a new, incompletely characterized entity, a histopathologic study was performed to compare lymphocytic colitis (n = 16), collagenous colitis (n = 17), idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (n = 16), acute colitis (n = 16), and histologically normal colon (n = 12). The study was a blinded semiquantitative analysis of histologic features in the surface epithelium, lamina propria, and crypts. The most distinctive feature of lymphocytic colitis was increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, particularly in the surface epithelium (P = .0001 v idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease, acute colitis, and normal colon). Other prominent features of lymphocytic colitis included surface epithelial damage (P less than .005 v idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease and normal colon), increased lamina propria chronic inflammation (P less than .01 v normal), and minimal crypt distortion or active cryptitis. There were striking similarities between lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis, but subepithelial collagen thickening was seen only in collagenous colitis. Idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease showed prominent crypt distortion and greater active inflammation, in addition to minimal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Acute colitis occasionally demonstrated prominent surface epithelial damage, but was otherwise dissimilar from lymphocytic colitis. We reached the following conclusions: (1) the entity "microscopic colitis" shows characteristic histopathology including prominent lymphocytic infiltration of epithelium, and thus, a more appropriate designation is lymphocytic colitis; (2) although lymphocytic colitis closely resembles collagenous colitis, each entity is distinct on biopsy; and (3) lymphocytic colitis is readily distinguishable from idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease, acute forms of colitis, and normal colorectum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0046-8177(89)90198-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 495

Metadata

Authors
Lazenby, A. J., Yardley, J. H., Giardiello, F. M., Jessurun, J., & Bayless, T. M.
Venue
Human Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
18-28
ISSN
0046-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102694285
Cited by
495
References
1
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lymphocytic (“microscopic”) colitis: A comparative histopathologic study with particular reference to collagenous colitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0046-8177(89)90198-6
The paper
Lazenby, A. J., Yardley, J. H., Giardiello, F. M., Jessurun, J., & Bayless, T. M. (1989). Lymphocytic (“microscopic”) colitis: A comparative histopathologic study with particular reference to collagenous colitis. Human Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0046-8177(89)90198-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.