Cited by 175Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthInflammatory Bowel Disease

Colonic immune cells in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Bashashati, M., Moossavi, S., Cremon, C., Barbaro, M. R., Moraveji, S., Talmon, G., Rezaei, N., Hughes, P. A. +11 more·2018·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background & aims Increases in mucosal immune cells have frequently been observed in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. However, this finding is not completely consistent between studies, possibly due to a combination of methodological variability, population differences and small sample sizes. We performed a meta-analysis of case-control studies that compared immune cell counts in colonic biopsies of IBS patients and controls. Methods PubMed and Embase were searched in February 2017. Results were pooled using standardized mean difference (SMD) and were considered significant when zero was not within the 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed based on I 2 statistics where I 2 ≤ 50% and I 2 > 50% indicated fixed and random effect models, respectively. Key results Twenty-two studies on 706 IBS patients and 401 controls were included. Mast cells were increased in the rectosigmoid (SMD: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.06-0.71]; P = .02) and descending colon (SMD: 1.69 [95% CI: 0.65-2.73]; P = .001) of IBS patients. Increased mast cells were observed in both constipation (IBS-C) and diarrhea predominant IBS (IBS-D). CD3 + T cells were increased in the rectosigmoid (SMD: 0.53 [95% CI: 0.21-0.85]; P = .001) and the descending colon of the IBS patients (SMD: 0.79, 95% CI [0.28-1.30]; P = .002). This was possibly in relation to higher CD4 + T cells in IBS (SMD: 0.33 [95% CI: 0.01-0.65]; P = .04) as there were no differences in CD8 + T cells. Conclusions & inferences Mast cells…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.13192

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In twin studies, concordance of a diagnosis of IBS is commoner in monozygotic, compared with dizygotic twins.

    “In twin studies, concordance of a diagnosis of IBS is commoner in monozygotic, compared with dizygotic twins; however, having a parent with IBS is a stronger predictor, suggesting that environmental factors such as learned illness behaviour are more important. 58”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [58]

  • Having a parent with IBS is a stronger predictor than twin concordance, suggesting that environmental factors such as learned illness behaviour are more important.

    “In twin studies, concordance of a diagnosis of IBS is commoner in monozygotic, compared with dizygotic twins; however, having a parent with IBS is a stronger predictor, suggesting that environmental factors such as learned illness behaviour are more important. 58”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [58]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bashashati, M., Moossavi, S., Cremon, C., Barbaro, M. R., Moraveji, S., Talmon, G., Rezaei, N., Hughes, P. A., Bian, Z. X., Choi, C. H., Lee, O. Y., Coëffier, M., Chang, L., Ohman, L., Schmulson, M. J., McCallum, R. W., Simren, M., Sharkey, K. A., & Barbara, G.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Digestive Disease Research Institute (IR)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (US)
  • Children's Medical Center (IR)
  • South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition and Microbiology and Immunology Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
  • Hospital General de México (MX)
  • Department of Internal Medicine & Clinical Nutrition Institute of Medicine Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Bashashati, M.
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-29
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
e13192
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
OpenAlex
W2751288039
Cited by
175
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Crohn's and Colitis Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, colonic mucosa, mucosal immune cells, mast cells, CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, colonic biopsy, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, colonic inflammation
MeSH terms
Colon, Humans, Mast Cells, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, CD3 Complex, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review