The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scientists in organizations—Productive climates for research and development
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: PERSONAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS AT WORK.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256657 · Cited by 3,749
The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136 · Cited by 2,734
The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312705052359 · Cited by 1,642
Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003 · Cited by 1,374
Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256366 · Cited by 1,051
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Criminal Justice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1978-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 280-281
- ISSN
- 0047-2352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1887907191
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientists in organizations—Productive climates for research and development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0047-2352(78)90023-5
- The paper
- Scientists in organizations—Productive climates for research and development. (1978). Journal of Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(78)90023-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
