The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decarceration: Community treatment and the deviant, a radical view
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nagin, D. S., Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (2009) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/599202 · Cited by 640
Deinstitutionalization: An Appraisal of Reform
Mechanic, D., & Rochefort, D. A. (1990) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001505 · Cited by 299
New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies
Brown, M., & Schept, J. (2017) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/1462474516666281 · Cited by 181
Formal Processing and Future Delinquency: Deviance Amplification as Selection Artifact
Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1990) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3053663 · Cited by 106
Recovery from mental health problems: scratching the surface without ethnography
Pilgrim, D. (2009) · Journal of Social Work Practice · doi:10.1080/02650530903375033 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Criminal Justice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1978-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189
- ISSN
- 0047-2352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084221657
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 166.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decarceration: Community treatment and the deviant, a radical view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0047-2352(78)90078-8
- The paper
- Decarceration: Community treatment and the deviant, a radical view. (1978). Journal of Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(78)90078-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
