Cited by 640Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

Imprisonment and Reoffending

Nagin, Daniel S., Cullen, Francis T., Jonson, Cheryl Lero·2009·Crime and Justice

Abstract

Imprisonment is the most severe punishment in democratic societies except for capital punishment, which is used only in the United States. Crime prevention is its primary rationale. Imprisonment may affect reoffending in various ways. It may be reduced by some combination of rehabilitation and what criminologists call specific deterrence. Sound arguments can be made, however, for a criminogenic effect (e.g., due to antisocial prison experiences or to stigma endured upon release). Remarkably little is known about the effects of imprisonment on reoffending. The existing research is limited in size, in quality, in its insights into why a prison term might be criminogenic or preventative, and in its capacity to explain why imprisonment might have differential effects depending on offenders’ personal and social characteristics. Compared with noncustodial sanctions, incarceration appears to have a null or mildly criminogenic effect on future criminal behavior. This conclusion is not sufficiently firm to guide policy generally, though it casts doubt on claims that imprisonment has strong specific deterrent effects. The evidence does provide a basis for outlining components of an agenda for substantive and policy relevant research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/599202

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence on the causal effects of incarceration is scarce.

    “Due to these challenges, evidence on the causal effects of incarceration is scarce.”

    From Incarceration, Recidivism, and Employment (2020) · cites this paper as Nagin et al. (2009)

  • Study findings have repeatedly shown that when low-risk offenders are brought into the justice system, the outcome is almost exclusively iatrogenic.

    “Study findings have repeatedly shown that when low‐risk offenders are brought into the justice system, the outcome is almost exclusively iatrogenic (e.g., Gatti, Tremblay, & Vitaro, 2009; Lowenkamp, Latessa, & Holsinger, 2006; Nagin, Cullen, & Jonson, 2009; Sperber, Latessa, & Makarios, 2013).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagin, D. S., Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L.
Venue
Crime and Justice
Published
2009-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
115-200
ISSN
  • 0192-3234 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-0416
OpenAlex
W1966208182
Cited by
640
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 32
FWCI
79.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Crime and Justice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
incarceration, recidivism, specific deterrence, criminogenic effects, rehabilitation, stigma, criminal policy, offender characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review