Cited by 220Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and modelsMarine and coastal ecosystems

The termination of the Equatorial Undercurrent in the eastern Pacific

Lukas, Roger·1986·Progress in Oceanography

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0079-6611(86)90007-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lukas, R.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Lukas, Roger
Venue
Progress in Oceanography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
63-90
ISSN
0079-6611 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976335483
Cited by
220
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
22.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Progress In Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
Equatorial Undercurrent, eastern tropical Pacific, Galápagos Islands, dynamic topography, geostrophic currents, seasonal variation, South Equatorial Current, remote forcing, wind reversal, ocean circulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review