The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance appraisal revisited
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Quality Circle programme can be successfully used for employee upskilling and reskilling for those who work with AI.
“One of the most well -known programs is the Quality Circle, which can be successfully used for employee upskilling and reskilling to those who work with AI.”
From The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workers' Skills: Upskilling and Reskilling in Organisations (2023) · cites this paper as Lawler et al., 1984
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Meyer, 1965, Split Roles in Performance Appraisal, Harvard Business Review
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workers' Skills: Upskilling and Reskilling in Organisations
Morandini, S., Fraboni, F., De Angelis, M., Puzzo, G., Giusino, D., & Pietrantoni, L. (2023) · Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/5078 · Cited by 439
“Members receive recognition when their suggestions for improving production are accepted (Lawler et al., 1984).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, A. M., & Resnick, S. M.
- ORCID
- Resnick, Susan M.
- Venue
- Organizational Dynamics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1984-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-35
- ISSN
- 0090-2616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023375733
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Keywords
- performance evaluation (human resources), appraisal effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
