The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Open accessAbstract
Thirty-three institutions collaborating in the Gynecologic Oncology Group gathered surgical and pathological data on 1125 patients with primary, previously untreated, histologically confirmed stage I cervical carcinoma with more than 3 mm of invasion who were selected to undergo radical hysterectomy and paraaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Of the 940 eligible, evaluable patients, 732 had squamous carcinoma. Of the study group, 87 (12%) did not undergo radical hysterectomy because of gross disease beyond the uterus or microscopic aortic node involvement documented at exploratory laparotomy. Among the 645 patients undergoing pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy and radical hysterectomy, five risk factors were significantly associated with microscopic pelvic lymph node metastasis: depth of invasion (P = 0.0001), parametrial involvement (P = 0.0001), capillary-lymphatic space invasion (P = 0.0001), tumor grade (P = 0.01), and gross versus occult primary tumor (P = 0.009). The factors identified as independent risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastasis by multivariate analysis were capillary-lymphatic space involvement (P less than 0.0001), depth of invasion (P less than 0.0001), parametrial involvement (P = 0.0005), and age (P = 0.02). The model was used to predict the chance of a patient having nodal metastasis for any combination of risk factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Keys, H. M., Bundy, B. N., Stehman, F. B., Muderspach, L. I., Chafe, W. E., Suggs, C. L., Walker, J. L., & Gersell, D. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199904153401503 · Cited by 1,923
Self-citationDelgado, G., Bundy, B., Zaino, R., Sevin, B.-U., Creasman, W. T., & Major, F. (1990) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/0090-8258(90)90072-s · Cited by 935
Self-citationKidd, E. A., Siegel, B. A., Dehdashti, F., & Grigsby, P. W. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22974 · Cited by 288
Lu, K. H., & Burke, T. W. (2000) · Current Treatment Options in Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11864-000-0059-0 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Delgado, G., Bundy, B. N., Fowler, W. C., Stehman, F. B., Sevin, B., Creasman, W. T., Major, F., DiSaia, P., & Zaino, R.
- Venue
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 314-320
- ISSN
- 0090-8258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999738237
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90070-x
- The paper
- Delgado, G., Bundy, B. N., Fowler, W. C., Stehman, F. B., Sevin, B., Creasman, W. T., Major, F., DiSaia, P., & Zaino, R. (1989). A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecologic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90070-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.