The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The standardized uptake value for F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival
Abstract
BACKGROUND.: The objective of this study was to evaluate cervical tumor uptake of F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) measured as the maximal standardized uptake value (SUV max) by positron emission tomography (PET) and its association with treatment response and prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS.: The study population consisted of 287 patients with stage IA2 through IVB cervical cancer who underwent pretreatment FDG‐PET studies. SUV max, tumor volume, and sites of lymph node metastasis were recorded. Therapy included surgery, chemoradiation, or palliation. RESULTS.: The mean SUV max was 11.4 (range, 1–50.4). The mean tumor volume by stage was 42.1 cm 3 for stage I tumors (using International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] staging criteria), 63.7 cm 3 for stage II tumors, 129.2 cm 3 for stage III tumors, and 166.2 cm 3 for stage IV tumors. There was no correlation between tumor volume and SUV max (correlation coefficient [R 2] = 0.01). No significant difference in SUV max was observed between squamous histology (n = 247 patients) and nonsquamous histology (n = 40 patients; P = .089). Higher SUV max was associated with an increased risk of lymph node metastasis at diagnosis (P = .0009). A Cox proportional‐hazards model for death from cervical cancer was used to evaluate tumor histology, lymph node metastasis, tumor volume, and SUV max. The results indicated that SUV max was the only significant independent factor (P = .0027). Three prognostic groups were established using SUV max. The overall survival rates at 5 years were 95% for an SUV max ≤ 5.2, 70% for an SUV max > 5.2 and ≤13.3, and 44% for an SUV max > 13.3 (P < .0001). Increasing SUV max was associated with persistent abnormal FDG uptake in the cervix on 3‐month FDG‐PET studies in 238 patients who received curative chemoradiation (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS.: The SUV max of the cervical tumor at diagnosis was a sensitive biomarker of treatment response and prognosis for patients with cervical cancer. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
Spiess, P. E., Lee, A. K., Leibovici, D., Wang, X., Do, K., & Pisters, L. L. (2006) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21979 · Cited by 1,930
Lymph Node Staging by Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Carcinoma of the Cervix
Grigsby, P. W., Siegel, B. A., & Dehdashti, F. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.17.3745 · Cited by 471
Self-citationVansteenkiste, J. F., Stroobants, S. G., Dupont, P. J., De Leyn, P. R., Verbeken, E. K., Deneffe, G. J., Mortelmans, L. A., & Demedts, M. G. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3201 · Cited by 439
Avril, N. E., Menzel, M. M., Dose, J., Schelling, M., Weber, W., Jänicke, F., NATHRATH, W. B. J., & Schwaiger, M. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 414
Delgado, G., Bundy, B. N., Fowler, W. C., Stehman, F. B., Sevin, B., Creasman, W. T., Major, F., DiSaia, P., & Zaino, R. (1989) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/0090-8258(89)90070-x · Cited by 380
Downey, R. J., Akhurst, T., Gonen, M., Vincent, A., Bains, M. S., Larson, S., & Rusch, V. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.11.109 · Cited by 358
Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology
Gunn, W. G. (2004) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.291.19.2383-a · Cited by 348
Cited by
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors
Wahl, R. L., Jacene, H., Kasamon, Y., & Lodge, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.057307 · Cited by 3,777
Han, S., Kim, H., Kim, Y. J., Suh, C. H., & Woo, S. (2018) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.18.19734 · Cited by 52
Vanderhoek, M., Perlman, S. B., & Jeraj, R. (2013) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.113332 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Kidd, E. A., Siegel, B. A., Dehdashti, F., & Grigsby, P. W.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09-19
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1738-1744
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2041862829
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The standardized uptake value for F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22974
- The paper
- Kidd, E. A., Siegel, B. A., Dehdashti, F., & Grigsby, P. W. (2007). The standardized uptake value for F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.