The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical-pathologic study of stage IIB, III, and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: Extended diagnostic evaluation for paraaortic node metastasis—A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Open accessAbstract
Three hundred twenty patients were entered into GOG Protocol 63, a clinical-pathologic study of stage IIB, III, and IVA cervical carcinoma. Following the completion of FIGO staging prerequisites, patients had computerized tomography (CT), a lymph-angiogram (LAG), and an ultrasound (US) of the aortic area. If any study was positive, a cytologic or histologic evaluation by fine-needle aspiration or selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed. Paraaortic node dissection was mandated for patients with negative extended staging studies. Results of extended staging evaluations were compared with histologic or cytologic results. Two hundred sixty-four patients were eligible and evaluable. One hundred sixty-seven patients (63%) were stage IIB, 89 (34%) were stage III, and 8 (3%) were stage IVA. Positive paraaortic nodes occurred in 21% of stage IIB, 31% of stage III, and 13% of stage IVA. LAG sensitivity was 79% with a specificity of 73%. Sensitivity of CT and US was 34 and 19%, respectively, with specificities of 96 and 99%, respectively. The frequency of false-negative results with LAG for patients with stage IIB disease was 6%. This decrease is consistent with a stable sensitivity and specificity. These findings suggest that a negative LAG may be adequate to eliminate surgical staging in subgroups with low risk of metastasis to the aortic nodes. Until new noninvasive testing methods are developed, LAG appears to be the most reliable noninvasive examination to evaluate spread of cervical cancer to aortic nodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bermudez, A., Bhatla, N., & Leung, E. (2015) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.004 · Cited by 657
Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update
Bhatla, N., Aoki, D., Sharma, D. N., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2021) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.13865 · Cited by 554
Choi, H. J., Ju, W., Myung, S. K., & Kim, Y. (2010) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01532.x · Cited by 317
Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2025 update
Bhatla, N., Aoki, D., Sharma, D. N., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2025) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.70277 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Heller, P. B., Malfetano, J. H., Bundy, B. N., Barnhill, D. R., & Okagaki, T.
- Venue
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 425-430
- ISSN
- 0090-8258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148390013
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical-pathologic study of stage IIB, III, and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: Extended diagnostic evaluation for paraaortic node metastasis—A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0090-8258(90)90085-y
- The paper
- Heller, P. B., Malfetano, J. H., Bundy, B. N., Barnhill, D. R., & Okagaki, T. (1990). Clinical-pathologic study of stage IIB, III, and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: Extended diagnostic evaluation for paraaortic node metastasis—A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecologic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(90)90085-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.