Paradoxical sleep and memory: Long-term disruptive effects of anisomycin
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Long-term memory for simpler tasks, like one-way active avoidance and simple mazes, were less consistently affected by REM sleep deprivation.
“In contrast, long-term memory for simpler tasks, like one-way active avoidance and simple mazes, were less consistently affected (15, 249, 386, 390, 495, 558, 611, 644, 821, 872, 902, 907-909, 1072, 1091, 1334).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [495]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Gutwein, B. M., Shiromani, P. J., & Fishbein, W.
- Affiliations
- City College of New York (US)
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377-384
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037097892
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- REM sleep, slow-wave sleep, anisomycin, protein synthesis inhibition, memory consolidation, passive avoidance, memory retention, amnesia, sleep-dependent memory processing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anisomycin, Avoidance Learning, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electroencephalography, Female, Male, Memory, Pyrrolidines, Sleep, REM, Time Factors, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review