Cited by 14Medical and Biological SciencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

A simple and rapid technique for preparing histological sections of brain

Shapiro, Raymond M., Badalamenti, Joseph I., Glick, Stanley D.·1983·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

A rapid technique for preparing histological sections of rodent brain is described. Sectioning and staining may be completed within two hours of sacrifice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-3057(83)90415-x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shapiro, R. M., Badalamenti, J. I., & Glick, S. D.
Affiliations
City University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Glick, Stanley D.
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-12
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1049-1050
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069132032
Cited by
14
References
8
Citations by year
2021: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
brain histology, rodent brain, tissue staining
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Frozen Sections, Microtomy, Staining and Labeling, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review