Cited by 160Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationMast cells and histamineAsthma and respiratory diseases

Tryptase levels in nasal-lavage fluid as an indicator of the immediate allergic response

Castells, Marianne, Schwartz, Lawrence B.·1988·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

To examine mast cell involvement in allergic rhinitis, levels of tryptase, a specific marker for mast cell activation, and histamine, a marker of mast cell and basophil activation, were measured in nasal-lavage fluid after nasal-allergen challenge. Twelve atopic subjects with allergic rhinitis and five nonatopic subjects were challenged with timothy grass or ragweed pollen at increasing doses of allergen. Tryptase and histamine levels were determined by an ELISA and radioenzyme assay, respectively; clinical responses were measured by assessment of sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and ocular tearing or itching. A positive clinical response was observed in seven of the atopic subjects and in none of the nonatopic subjects. Tryptase levels increased at least sevenfold higher than baseline levels in 100% of the atopic clinical responders and reached a maximum at the same dose of allergen where clinical symptoms were maximal. In contrast, histamine levels were only threefold or greater elevated in five of seven atopic clinical responders at this dose of allergen. (Histamine levels were lower in one subject and were only 50% higher in another subject than the corresponding baseline value.) Histamine levels and symptom scores were maximal at the same dose of allergen in only four of seven clinical responders. Overlap of peak mediator levels in subjects without a clinical response with those of the clinical responders occurred only in the case of histamine. Tryptase levels in nasal-lavage fluid appear promising as a useful indicator of allergic reactions and indicate that mast cell activation is the major factor in the immediate nasal-allergic response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90005-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castells, M., & Schwartz, L. B.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-09
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
348-355
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121422859
Cited by
160
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI20487)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
tryptase, histamine, mast cell activation, allergic rhinitis, nasal lavage fluid, nasal allergen challenge, timothy grass pollen, ragweed pollen, atopy, basophil activation, mediator release
MeSH terms
Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic, Female, Histamine, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Male, Mast Cells, Middle Aged, Nasal Mucosa, Nasal Provocation Tests, Peptide Hydrolases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review