The effects of informational feedback and self-beliefs on the motivation to perform a self-regulated task
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Feedback and tutorial assistance available within an online homework system are critical in helping students gauge and improve their level of understanding.
“The feedback and tutorial assistance that are available within an online homework system are critical in helping students gauge their level of understanding and find ways to improve their level of understanding (Tuckman & Sexton, 1992;Zerr, 2007).”
From The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students (2009) · cites this paper as Tuckman & Sexton, 1992
Cites
Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis.
Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis.
Stajković, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240 · Cited by 3,850 · see citing works
Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences.
Judge, T., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B., & Rich, B. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107 · Cited by 902 · see citing works
Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies
Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
“Variables that have been investigated so far include expectancies (e.g., Narciss & Huth, 2004; Timmers et al., 2012; Tuckman & Sexton, 1992), goal orientation (e.g., Senko & Harackiewicz, 2005), and task-value beliefs (e.g., Timmers et al., 2012).”
BackgroundE-learning Motivation and Educational Portal Acceptance in Developing Countries
Maldonado, U., Khan, G., Moon, J., & Rho, J. (2011) · Online information review (Print) · doi:10.1108/14684521111113597 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
“The research instrument was developed based on the items adopted from the Venkatesh et al. (2003) model and motivational theories (Brophy, 1988, 2004; Tuckman and Sexton, 1992; Glynn and Koballa, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodPredicting procrastination: the role of academic achievement, self-efficacy and perfectionism.
Kurtovic, A., Vrdoljak, G., & Idzanovic, A. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.17583/ijep.2019.2993 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
“Given the fact that procrastination is, according to Steel (2007), a failure in self-regulation, Tuckman and Sexton (1992) concluded that lower sense of personal IJEP – International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(1) 15 efficacy in dealing with external events leads to procrastination.”
BackgroundThe Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students
Brewer, D. S. (2009) · Utah State University · doi:10.26076/e6cf-1985 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Parmaksız, İ. (2022) · Psychology in the schools (Print) · doi:10.1002/pits.22765 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Zhao, X., Wang, H., Ma, Z.-M., Zhang, L., & Chang, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1572963 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“According to Tuckman and Sexton, self-beliefs serve as a bridge between external factors and self-regulatory performance (40).”
Saçkes, M., & Trundle, K. C. (2013) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9355-y · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…those who have emerging skills and knowledge, and we can provide immediate feedback on their learning of specific science concepts, which can make preservice teachers feel more efficacious about learning science (Greene et al. 2004; Pajares and Miller 1994; Tuckman 2003; Tuckman and Sexton 1992).”
BackgroundTuckman, B. (2003) · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00075-2 · Cited by 10
Self-citationUsing a Cultural Intelligence Assessment to Teach Global Leadership.
Whitaker, B. L., & Greenleaf, J. (2017) · doi:10.12806/v16/i1/a1 · Cited by 10
“As is well established in the literature, learner confidence, sometimes referred to as academic self-efficacy, is positively correlated with a number of academic performance indicators (Tuckman & Sexton, 1992).”
BackgroundWie lässt sich die Experimentierstrategie-Nutzung fördern?
Marschner, J., Thillmann, H., Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2012) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-012-0260-5 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Panattil, S. J., George, A., Sajid, M., & Joy, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1080/15378020.2023.2294415 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“This finding aligns with studies in organizational contexts that observe informational feedback to increase perceptions of competence (Tuckman & Sexton, 1992).”
Redesigning the Work in Business Communication
Mccarthy, P. R., & McCarthy, H. (2003) · doi:10.1177/108056990306600406 · Cited by 5
MODERN WORLD CHALLENGES AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE EDUCATION SYSTEM
Stancu, I., Criveanu, R. C., & Răduţ, E. (2008) · doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:1409
“Similarly, Tuckman and Sexton (1992) illustrated that in a competitive situation, a feedback strategy gave good results for students with a medium and low efficacy.”
Background
- Authors
- Tuckman, B. W., & Sexton, T. L.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tuckman, Bruce W
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-127
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060094210
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- information feedback, self-belief, self-efficacy, student self-regulation, task motivation, performance feedback, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
