Cited by 115Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesStudent Stress and CopingGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Predicting procrastination: the role of academic achievement, self-efficacy and perfectionism.

Open access
Kurtovic, Ana, Vrdoljak, Gabrijela, Idzanovic, Anita·2019·International Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the relations of academic achievement, self-efficacy, and perfectionism with procrastination in University students, and to examine whether procrastination can be predicted by academic achievement, self-efficacy, and perfectionism dimensions. 227 University students from different faculties completed Tuckmans' procrastination scale, Almost Perfect Scale – Revised (APS-R; Slaney Rice, Mobley, Trippi, & Ashby, 2001) and General self-Efficacy Scale (GSE; Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995), as well as data about academic achievement at the end of last academic year. Results have shown negative correlations of academic achievement, self-efficacy and adaptive perfectionism with procrastination, and a positive correlation between maladaptive perfectionism and procrastination. Results have also shown that self-efficacy is positively correlated with adaptive perfectionism and negatively with maladaptive perfectionism. Maladaptive perfectionism was a positive predictor of procrastination, while academic achievement, self-efficacy and adaptive perfectionism were all negative predictors. Finally, we used Hayes bootstrapping method to examine possible mediations. The results have shown that self-efficacy, by its self, is not a significant mediator, while paths containing self-efficacy and adaptive or maladaptive perfectionism mediate the relation between academic achievement and procrastination. Furthermore, both adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism mediated the relation between self-efficacy and procrastination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17583/ijep.2019.2993

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A relatively broad set of efficacy-building experiences, course by course, is necessary.

    “a relatively broad set of on efficacy-building experiences, course by course, is necessary (→Lack of study skill training), though not necessarily enough on its own (Kurtovic et al., 2019).”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Kurtovic et al., 2019

    The results (IJEP 8(1), p. 11) say self-efficacy alone was not a significant mediator of the relationship between academic achievement and procrastination, supporting the qualification that it may not be enough on its own. The Implications and Limitations section recommends improving self-efficacy alongside learning skills and goal-setting, but does not establish that a broad set of efficacy-building experiences is necessary or should be provided course by course. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cerino, R. S. (2014). Relationship between academic motivation, self- efficacy, and academic procrastination. Journal of Psychological Research, 19, 156-163. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8095/649cde648fcd39c8ac13b8af60 87af979046.pdf
  2. Narges, R., Salman, Z., & Baharak H. (2014). Self -Efficacy, Perfectionism and Personality Traits as Predictors of Academic Procrastination among University Students, Journal of Applied Environmental Biological Science. 4, 265-271. Retrieved from https://www.textroad.com/pdf/JAEBS/J.%20Appl.%20Environ.%20 Biol.%20Sci.,%204(8)265-271,%202014.pdf
  3. Rahmani, N., Zarei, S., & Hamedi, B. (2014). Self -Efficacy, Perfectionism and Personality Traits as Predictors of Academic Procrastination among University Students. Journal of Applied Environmental Biological Sciences, 4, 265-271.
  4. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35- 37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurtovic, A., Vrdoljak, G., & Idzanovic, A.
Affiliations
University of Osijek (HR)
Venue
International Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
Hipatia Press
Published
2019-02-24
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
2014-3591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917192083
Cited by
115
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
14.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hipatia Press (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
procrastination, academic performance, self-efficacy, perfectionism, adaptive perfectionism, maladaptive perfectionism, university students, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review