The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gap junctional communication in the post-implantation mouse embryo
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Gap Junction Communication Channel
Kumar, N. M., & Gilula, N. B. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81282-9 · Cited by 1,917
Self-citationConnections with Connexins: the Molecular Basis of Direct Intercellular Signaling
Bruzzone, R., White, T. W., & Paul, D. L. (1996) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0001q.x · Cited by 1,302
Multicellular spheroids: A review on cellular aggregates in cancer research
Mueller-Klieser, W. (1987) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/bf00391431 · Cited by 434
Jongen, W. M., Fitzgerald, D. J., Asamoto, M., Piccoli, C., Slaga, T. J., Gros, D., Takeichi, M., & Yamasaki, H. (1991) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.114.3.545 · Cited by 364
Essential roles of KIF4 and its binding partner PRC1 in organized central spindle midzone formation
Kurasawa, Y., Earnshaw, W. C., Mochizuki, Y., Dohmae, N., & Todokoro, K. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600347 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Lo, C. W., & Gilula, N. B.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1979-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 411-422
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975953566
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gap junctional communication in the post-implantation mouse embryo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0092-8674(79)90060-6
- The paper
- Lo, C. W., & Gilula, N. B. (1979). Gap junctional communication in the post-implantation mouse embryo. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(79)90060-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
