The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pseudogenes in yeast?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How did alternative splicing evolve?
Ast, G. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1451 · Cited by 555
RNA-based gene duplication: Mechanistic and evolutionary insights
Kaessmann, H., Vinckenbosch, N., & Long, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2487 · Cited by 449
Retroposons—Seeds of Evolution
Brosius, J. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1990437 · Cited by 377
BECK, J., RIPKA, S., SIEGNER, A., SCHILTZ, E., & SCHWEIZER, E. (1990) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19252.x · Cited by 302
The biology of intron gain and loss
Jeffares, D. C., Mourier, T., & Penny, D. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.10.006 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Fink, G. R.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-6
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044042298
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pseudogenes in yeast? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90746-x
- The paper
- Fink, G. R. (1987). Pseudogenes in yeast? Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90746-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
