Cited by 3,348Advanced Control Systems OptimizationFault Detection and Control SystemsControl Systems and Identification

A plant-wide industrial process control problem

Downs, J.J., Vogel, E.F.·1993·Computers & Chemical Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0098-1354(93)80018-i

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Downs, J. J., & Vogel, E. F.
Affiliations
Eastman Chemical Company (United States) (US)
Venue
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-03
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
245-255
ISSN
0098-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004186751
Cited by
3,348
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 258 · 2025: 250 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 205 · 2022: 226 · 2021: 233 · 2020: 218 · 2019: 246 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 166 · 2016: 139 · 2015: 142 · 2014: 122 · 2013: 108 · 2012: 81
FWCI
33.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Chemical Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
plantwide control, multivariable control, process disturbances, process simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review