Cited by 30Smart Grid Security and ResilienceIndustrial Automation and Control SystemsNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

Physical process resilience-aware network design for SCADA systems

Genge, Béla, Siaterlis, Christos·2014·Computers & Electrical Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.018

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urias et al. describe a hybrid test bed that can be used to perform cyber-physical security analysis.

    “Urias et al. [29] describe a hybrid test bed that can be used to perform cyber-physical security analysis.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Genge, B., & Siaterlis, C.
Affiliations
Joint Research Centre (IT)
Corresponding author
Genge, Béla
Venue
Computers & Electrical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
142-157
ISSN
0045-7906 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033331833
Cited by
30
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Electrical Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
SCADA systems, network partitioning, resilience engineering, physical process modeling, graph representation, industrial control systems, cyber-physical attacks, Tennessee Eastman process, attack scenarios

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review