The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parent and adolescent perceptions of family functioning: a comparison of clinic and non‐clinic families
Abstract
In this paper two studies are reported which compare (a) the perceptions of family functioning held by clinic and non‐clinic adolescents, and (b) the perceptions of family functioning held by adolescents and their mothers in clinic and non‐clinic families. In Study 1, matched group of clinic and non‐clinic adolescents were compared on their responses to a 30‐item scale (ICPS) designed to measure three factors of family functioning: Intimacy (high vs. low), Parenting Style (democratic vs. controlled) and Conflict (high vs. low). Clinic and non‐clinic adolescents were also compared on their responses to a multi‐dimensional measure of adolescent self‐concept. Although there was little difference between the two groups of adolescents in terms of their perceptions of family functioning, there were strong relationships between the self‐concept variables and the family functioning variables. In Study 2, comparisons were made between the perceptions of family functioning held by mothers and adolescents for both clinical and non‐clinic families. There were no differences between the two groups of adolescents in terms of their perceptions of family functioning, although there were clear differences between the two groups of mothers. In addition, clinic adolescents and their mothers did not differ in their perceptions of the family, whereas adolescents in the non‐clinic group saw their families significantly as less intimate and more conflicted than did their mothers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Intimacy subscale was chosen for this paper since it highly correlates with functional outcomes (Noller et al., 1992).”
From Psychosocial outcomes in young adults with childhood traumatic brain injury: A 20‐year follow‐up study (2026) · cites this paper as Noller et al., 1992
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1037/0022-006X.47.2.223 · DOI · Paper page
- Achenbach T.M., 1983, Manual for the Child Behaviour Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile
- 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00085.x · DOI
- 10.2190/AG.2.4.b · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-444450-8.50014-6 · DOI
- 10.2307/352574 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1978.tb00537.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1129730 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/351420 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00073.x · doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00073.x
- 10.3102/00028312022003422 · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674041127 · DOI · Paper page
- Niemi R.G., 1968, A methodological study of public socialization in the family
- Niemi R.G., 1974, How Family Members Perceive each Other: Political and Social Attitudes in Two Generations
- Noller P., 1988, ICPS Family Functioning Scales
- 10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80030-6 · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.24.5.707 · DOI
- Noller P., 1991, The Adolescent in the Family
- Noller P., 1990, The ICPS Family Functioning Measure on a sample of pre‐college adolescents
- Olson D.R., 1985, FACES III
- Olson D.H., 1983, Families: What makes them work?
- 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00003.x · DOI · Paper page
- Rollins, 1979, Contemporary Theories about the Family Vol. 1. Research‐based Theories of the Family
- 10.2307/351733 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Ryan, N. P., Anderson, V., Godfrey, C., Beauchamp, M. H., Coleman, L., Eren, S., Rosema, S., Taylor, K., & Catroppa, C. (2014) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3153 · Cited by 107
Botchway‐Commey, E., Ryan, N. P., Crowe, L., Godfrey, C., Macleod, H., Hearps, S., Anderson, V. A., & Catroppa, C. (2026) · Journal of Neuropsychology · doi:10.1111/jnp.70042
Metadata
- Authors
- Noller, P., Seth‐Smith, M., Bouma, R., & Schweitzer, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescence
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-114
- ISSN
- 0140-1971
- 1095-9254
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.