Cited by 107Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesChild Abuse and Trauma

Predictors of very-long-term sociocognitive function after pediatric traumatic brain injury: evidence for the vulnerability of the immature “social brain”

Ryan, Nicholas P., Anderson, Vicki, Godfrey, Celia, Beauchamp, Miriam H., Coleman, Lee, Eren, Senem, Rosema, Stefanie, Taylor, Kaitlyn +1 more·2014·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Emotion perception (EP) forms an integral part of social communication and is critical to attain developmentally appropriate goals. This skill, which emerges relatively early in development, is driven by increasing connectivity among regions of a distributed sociocognitive neural network and may be vulnerable to disruption from early-childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI). The present study aimed to evaluate the very-long-term effect of childhood TBI on EP, as well as examine the contribution of injury- and non-injury-related risk and resilience factors to variability in sociocognitive outcomes. Thirty-four young adult survivors of early-childhood TBI (mean [M], 20.62 years; M time since injury, 16.55 years) and 16 typically developing controls matched for age, gender, and socioeconomic status were assessed using tasks that required recognition and interpretation of facial and prosodic emotional cues. Survivors of severe childhood TBI were found to have significantly poorer emotion perception than controls and young adults with mild-to-moderate injuries. Further, poorer emotion perception was associated with reduced volume of the posterior corpus callosum, presence of frontal pathology, lower SES, and a less-intimate family environment. Our findings lend support to the vulnerability of the immature "social brain" network to early disruption and underscore the need for context-sensitive rehabilitation that optimizes early family environments to enhance recovery of EP skills after childhood TBI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.2013.3153

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryan, N. P., Anderson, V., Godfrey, C., Beauchamp, M. H., Coleman, L., Eren, S., Rosema, S., Taylor, K., & Catroppa, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center (CA)
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Ryan, Nicholas P.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2014-04
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
649-657
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1968002435
Cited by
107
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • State Government of Victoria
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
pediatric traumatic brain injury, emotion perception, social brain network, corpus callosum volume, frontal lobe pathology, socioeconomic status, family environment, resilience factors, facial emotion recognition, long-term outcomes, young adults
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Survivors, Young Adult, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review