Cited by 685Child Nutrition and Water AccessPublic Health and NutritionPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Nutritional supplementation, psychosocial stimulation, and mental development of stunted children: the Jamaican Study

Grantham-McGregor, S.M, Powell, C.A, Walker, S.P, Himes, J.H·1991·The Lancet

Abstract

There is little unequivocal evidence that nutritional supplementation of undernourished children has a beneficial effect on their mental development. The effects of nutritional supplementation, with or without psychosocial stimulation, of growth-retarded (stunted) children aged 9-24 months were assessed in a study in Kingston, Jamaica. 129 children from poor neighbourhoods were randomly assigned to four groups--control, supplemented only, stimulated only, and supplemented plus stimulated. A group of matched non-stunted children (n = 32) was also included. The supplement comprised 1 kg milk-based formula per week for 2 years, and the stimulation weekly play sessions at home with a community health aide. The children's development (DQ) was assessed on the Griffiths mental development scales. Initially the stunted groups' DQs were lower than those of the non-stunted group, and those of the control group declined during the study, increasing their deficit. Stimulation and supplementation had significant independent beneficial effects on the children's development. Estimates of the supplementation effect ranged from 2.2 (95% confidence limits-1.4, 5.7) for the hand and eye subscale to 12.4 (5.4, 19.5) for the locomotor subscale and those for the stimulation effect from 6.4 (2.8, 10.0) for hand and eye to 10.3 (3.3, 17.3) for locomotor. The treatment effects were additive, and combined interventions were significantly more effective than either alone. These findings suggest that po…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90001-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal studies in Bangladesh, Costa Rica, and Jamaica reported that infant and toddler home stimulation quality predicted IQ or global development in preschool or middle childhood.

    “By contrast, longitudinal studies in Bangladesh, Costa Rica, and Jamaica all reported that infant and toddler home stimulation quality predicted IQ or global development in preschool or middle childhood (Grantham-McGregor et al. 1991;Lozoff et al. 1995;Hamadani, Tofail, and Huda 2014;Walker et al. 2000).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 685

Authors
Grantham-McGregor, S. M., Powell, C. A., Walker, S. P., & Himes, J. H.
Affiliations
  • University of the West Indies (JM)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-07
Volume
338
Issue
8758
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2164417916
Cited by
685
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
16.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
stunting, malnutrition, dietary supplementation, psychosocial stimulation, cognitive development, child growth retardation, milk-based formula, combined intervention
MeSH terms
Female, Growth Disorders, Humans, Infant, Jamaica, Male, Intellectual Disability, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review